Originally Posted by miller-time
It isn't perspective. It is loaded. Why not include any other thing that causes death?
The argument they are implying is that if something else causes death and can be technically banned, then either everything should be banned or nothing should be banned.
I don't think that is what they are arguing at all...all the focus of that image is on assault rifles...
"THIS RIFLE is the same as...THIS RIFLE...and fires only one round per trigger like THIS"
the lowest death count on there is the assault rifle...
it isn't saying "ban everything that kills"...it is saying "hey look at how dumb we are for thinking assault rifles are our biggest problem, maybe we should focus on the bigger issues"