Originally Posted by InspiredLebowski
I don't mean to upset beer or any other UCLA fan here, but really thinking about it, other than history and location (which is a lot, I realize), UCLA's fairly behind the curve as a top tier program. Insanely high standards, facilities are below average, the current administration's not all that hyped on athletics, public school in a bankrupt state, the fan support's so fair weathered it's ridiculous.
If you made a list of pros/cons of their program and took the name "UCLA" off the top of it people really wouldn't be all that impressed.
do you mean academically?
is there really a big difference between different schools, in what athletes they will let in?