Message Board Basketball Forum - InsideHoops

Message Board Basketball Forum - InsideHoops (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/index.php)
-   NBA Forum (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   No triple-double for LeBron in NY: NBA rescinds that 10th rebound (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=119525)

Istealfrombums 02-06-2009 05:11 PM

No triple-double for LeBron in NY: NBA rescinds that 10th rebound
 
"NBA has announced LeBron James was mistakenly credited with one of Ben Wallace's rebounds."

Somehow this is breaking news on Yahoo Sports!

UPDATE: Here is the story: http://www.insidehoops.com/blog/?p=3344

lilojmayo 02-06-2009 05:14 PM

Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stacey King
Link?

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba;_ylt=Ai0...ACoo1XiE45nYcB

Stacey King 02-06-2009 05:15 PM

Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"
 
You're right, I'm looking at it too. While it's only one rebound, it really changes things- from a historical significance standpoint at least.

eliteballer 02-06-2009 05:16 PM

Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"
 
Serves his stat-padding rear right:roll:

Prodigy 02-06-2009 05:16 PM

Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"
 
****ing scrub that Lebron. How dare he fail at a triple double. Trade his overrated ass. Raptors will give you Jermaine O'Neal.

lilojmayo 02-06-2009 05:18 PM

Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by eliteballer
Serves his stat-padding rear right:roll:


he did stat pad. It was obvious from his last rebound he got noticed how none of the cavs player even went for the rebound.

LeBron cares to much about stats he really does.

barbaroi 02-06-2009 05:19 PM

Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lilojmayo
* Waits for Laker/Kobe Fans you say Kobe had the better Game Now*

It was the better game before the rebound was taken back and it is the better game after as well.
Lebron had 8 more minutes to play. Give Kobe 8 more minutes and he was on pace for 75. In addition to that Kobe's 61 led to the lakers blowing the knicks out, while Lebron's 52 had the game going down to the wire.

Prodigy 02-06-2009 05:20 PM

Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lilojmayo
* Waits for Laker/Kobe Fans you say Kobe had the better Game Now*



Well no duh. One rebound can drastically change history. You think if the Shaq field goal that was blocked had gone into the hands of Bibby instead of Horry we'd be talking about "any SG + Shaq = 3 titles"? No. We'd be talking about "any SG + Shaq = titles in off years ala Duncan".

andgar923 02-06-2009 05:21 PM

Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by eliteballer
Serves his stat-padding rear right:roll:


And Kobe going after the Garden record wasn't?

Prodigy 02-06-2009 05:21 PM

Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbaroi
It was the better game before the rebound was taken back and it is the better game after as well.
Lebron had 8 more minutes to play. Give Kobe 8 more minutes and he was on pace for 75. In addition to that Kobe's 61 led to the lakers blowing the knicks out, while Lebron's 52 had the game going down to the wire.


I strongly disagree. Any idiot will be able to tell you that a triple double highly transcends a 52-10-9 performance. It's not even close. Even Ricky Davis would be able to tell you that. Don't feign ignorance with us young man.

StroShow4 02-06-2009 05:22 PM

Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"
 
if this is true, it's extremely lame. it's been days since the triple double, you can't take it away now.

Stacey King 02-06-2009 05:23 PM

Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"
 
[quote=Prodigy]Well no duh. One rebound can drastically change history. You think if the Shaq field goal that was blocked had gone into the hands of Bibby instead of Horry we'd be talking about "any SG + Shaq = 3 titles"? No. We'd be talking about "any SG + Shaq = titles in off years ala Duncan".[/QUOTE]

Not true, as the Lakers had already won two in a row ('00,'01) before that series against the Kings in '02.

andgar923 02-06-2009 05:23 PM

Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbaroi
It was the better game before the rebound was taken back and it is the better game after as well.
Lebron had 8 more minutes to play. Give Kobe 8 more minutes and he was on pace for 75. In addition to that Kobe's 61 led to the lakers blowing the knicks out, while Lebron's 52 had the game going down to the wire.


Yet in 8 less minutes, Kobe managed to take more ft's and a few less shots.

Prodigy 02-06-2009 05:23 PM

Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stacey King

Not true, as the Lakers had already won two in a row ('00,'01) before that series against the Kings in '02.


Damnit all.

DuMa 02-06-2009 05:24 PM

Re: "No triple-double for LeBron"
 
lebron will just have to go for another 50-10-10 game vs the Lakers :)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Terms of Use/Service | Privacy Policy