Message Board Basketball Forum - InsideHoops

Go Back   Message Board Basketball Forum - InsideHoops > InsideHoops Main Basketball Forums > Off the Court Lounge

Off the Court Lounge Basketball fans talk about everything EXCEPT basketball here

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-24-2012, 08:05 PM   #1
jaydacris
Rose
 
jaydacris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rose
Posts: 17,247
jaydacris is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginablejaydacris is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginablejaydacris is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginablejaydacris is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginablejaydacris is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginablejaydacris is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginablejaydacris is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginablejaydacris is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginablejaydacris is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginablejaydacris is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginablejaydacris is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginable
Default Judge rules in favor of Apple. In Apple vs Samsung trial.

http://www.dailytech.com/Jury+Finds+...ticle25515.htm

Quote:
Samsung is ordered to pay $1.05B USD in damages; virtually all of Samsung's products likely to be banned in the U.S.

In a shockingly short amount of time, it was revealed this afternoon that the jury has reached a verdict in the Apple vs. Samsung case [1][2] in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Apple CEO Tim Cook and Samsung CEO Kwon Oh-hyun were given one last chance earlier this week to reach a settlement before the matter was put into the hands of the jury, but those efforts failed.

Deliberations for the case began on Wednesday, and given how impressively complex the case has been with regards to design patent infringement claims and counter claims, this is quite surprising that the jury was able to reach a verdict in such a relatively short amount of time. The jury reported that it reached its verdict at 2:35 p.m. PST on Friday.

I. Background

Apple, Inc. (AAPL) is asking $2.5 billion in damages from Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (KSC:005930) and over 700 issued had to be resolved by the jury in this tangled web spun in the countroom for the past month by lawyers from both sides.

Samsung and Apple are the two largest and most profitable phonemakers in America, with Apple posting several times the profit of Samsung, and Samsung outselling Apple almost 2-to-1 in present quarterly unit sales.

Apple in April 2011 sued Samsung for "slavishly copying" its smartphones and tablets. Samsung responded with a countersuit later that month, and the conflict quickly escalated to courts worldwide.


A Netherlands ruling found Apple innocent and Samsung guilty, but only led to a brief ban on a handful of Apple products; a ruling in South Korea this week found both companies guilty and again only led to a handful of product bans. A German ruling instituted the stiffest ban -- a complete sales prohibition on Samsung's flagship tablets. However, Samsung has been able to circumvent that design-based ruling via redesigning its tablet's shell.

Steve Jobs who masterminded the lawsuit against Samsung, calling for "thermonuclear" war with Samsung and its fellow Android phonemakers, resigned exactly one year ago today and died shortly thereafter.

II. The Verdict


Samsung has been found guilt of violating the '301 ("bounce patent"; all devices), U.S. Patent No. 7,844,915 ("pinch to zoom"; almost all devices), U.S. Patent No. 7,469,381 (all devices), and '163 ("double tap to zoom"; some devices, but not others) technology patents for most of its smartphone and tablet devices.

The '915 patent covers pinch to zoom. Pinch to zoom was first dreamt up decades ago by Myron Krueger and the University of Toronto developed and published papers on virtually equivalent technology almost 25 years prior to Apple producing its first multi-touch device (the iPhone), but Apple claims to have "invented" pinch-to-zoom as it appeared to be the first to do it in the context of a capacitive multi-touch screen.


The Samsung Galaxy S II was one of many Samsung products found to have infringed on Apple patents.

The '301 patent is the so-called "bounce" or "rubber-band" patent, that covers a transient response -- essentially an animation that mimics naturally occurring phenomena, such as a spring. Apple has been granted exclusive rights by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to animate this class of phenomena, oft observed visually in nature.

More surprisingly the jury found Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's U.S. Design Patent No. D618,677 and D593,087, which Apple's attorney's argued in testimony give it exclusive rights to produce rectangular smartphones with rounded edges.

The jury found that the Galaxy S (and its various branded names) infringed on both Apple patents, but Samsung's new Galaxy S II smartphone (and its various branded names) only violated the '677 patent.

Samsung did get a small reprieve, being found innocent of similar claims regarding Apple's iPad design patent -- U.S. Design Patent D504,889. None of Samsung's tablets were found to infringe on the '889 patent.

Nearly all the infringement was dubbed willful and that Samsung should have known, which is very bad news for Samsung.
The jury awarded Apple $1.05B in damages.

The jury also ruled that Samsung had not successfully argued any of Apple's patents -- including the design ones -- were invalid.

Samsung, according to the jury, "diluted" Apple's trade dress with the sweeping infringements they found it guilty of.

The jury ordered Samsung to pay Apple $1,051,855,000 USD ($1.05B USD).

The jury found Apple innocent of infringing on Samsung's U.S. Patent No. 7,698,711, '893, '460, and '516 patents. Samsung was found innocent of antitrust violations for litigating with its 3G and 4G standards patents, but it was barred from future litigation ("patent exhaustion")

(JM: This is not as bad as it could have been, especially considering that Samsung was found guilty on most counts and that Apple wanted $2.5B USD. Worldwide, Samsung makes close to $4B USD in profit per quarter off its smartphones --so this is between a third to a quarter of Samsung's quartery profit. Severe, certainly, but not enough to remove Samsung from the market.)

III. What's Next

The damages aren't really the worst part of this for Samsung.

The very bad part is that it will no find virtually all of its smartphones banned from sale in the U.S., pending software and design modifications. This could literally cost it several times the damages in lost sales.

Judge Lucy Koh has yet to deliver a final ruling, which will likely include product bans, but that should come in a matter of days. One thing's for sure -- Samsung is going to appeal this, but it's likely to lose billions in the meantime.

The Galaxy S III is spared merely because it was too fresh to be banned, but Apple could use the jury's sweeping ruling as leverage to push for a speedy ban on that device to by the U.S. International Trade Commission.

Apple has done it -- it's quite literally dealt a death blow to the biggest Android phonemaker's U.S. sales.

oh damn
jaydacris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:11 PM   #2
Al Thornton
the mind is so complex
 
Al Thornton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: when you're based
Posts: 21,354
Al Thornton is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableAl Thornton is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableAl Thornton is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableAl Thornton is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableAl Thornton is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableAl Thornton is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableAl Thornton is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableAl Thornton is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableAl Thornton is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableAl Thornton is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableAl Thornton is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginable
Default Re: Judge rules in favor of Apple. In Apple vs Samsung trial.

rip
Al Thornton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:15 PM   #3
jamal99
Valar Morghulis
 
jamal99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Serbia
Posts: 4,887
jamal99 has an incredible reputation herejamal99 has an incredible reputation herejamal99 has an incredible reputation herejamal99 has an incredible reputation herejamal99 has an incredible reputation herejamal99 has an incredible reputation here
Default Re: Judge rules in favor of Apple. In Apple vs Samsung trial.

Really ****ing stupid lawsuit. It's bullshit made up by Apple to get Samsung off US market.
Samsung >>>> Apple
Android >>>> iOS
jamal99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:18 PM   #4
dunksby
ISH's Scribbler
 
dunksby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 9,285
dunksby is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterdunksby is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterdunksby is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterdunksby is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterdunksby is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterdunksby is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterdunksby is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterdunksby is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterdunksby is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterdunksby is considered a brilliant InsideHoops poster
Default Re: Judge rules in favor of Apple. In Apple vs Samsung trial.

Obviously bought jury.
dunksby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:19 PM   #5
AK47DR91
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Judge rules in favor of Apple. In Apple vs Samsung trial.

More reasons for me to not buy Apple products.

I still want a refund on my Ipod nano.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:19 PM   #6
Killbot
KillImpaleLiquefyLynch
 
Killbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bombing Organisms Timelessly
Posts: 19,992
Killbot is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableKillbot is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableKillbot is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableKillbot is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableKillbot is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableKillbot is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableKillbot is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableKillbot is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableKillbot is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableKillbot is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginableKillbot is the Michael Jordan of posters with the best reputation imaginable
Default Re: Judge rules in favor of Apple. In Apple vs Samsung trial.

Bad sign. Apple is going to jack up their smart phone prices now.
Killbot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:22 PM   #7
ImmortalD24
Banned
 
ImmortalD24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: /watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o&#t=4299s
Posts: 3,166
ImmortalD24 has an incredible reputation hereImmortalD24 has an incredible reputation hereImmortalD24 has an incredible reputation hereImmortalD24 has an incredible reputation hereImmortalD24 has an incredible reputation hereImmortalD24 has an incredible reputation here
Default Re: Judge rules in favor of Apple. In Apple vs Samsung trial.

Is it just banned in the US?
ImmortalD24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:30 PM   #8
Stuckey
ifirtworld
 
Stuckey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: igloo
Posts: 7,654
Stuckey has a terrific reputationStuckey has a terrific reputationStuckey has a terrific reputationStuckey has a terrific reputationStuckey has a terrific reputationStuckey has a terrific reputation
Default Re: Judge rules in favor of Apple. In Apple vs Samsung trial.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AK47DR91
More reasons for me to not buy Apple products.

I still want a refund on my Ipod nano.

which generation? if it's that small touchscreen one, ill buy it off ya
Stuckey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:32 PM   #9
falc39
Good High School Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 900
falc39 has decent reputation
Default Re: Judge rules in favor of Apple. In Apple vs Samsung trial.

Funny thing is Samsung seems to be gaining a lot of popularity from this. I live in Silicon Valley and the people I know who are happy owners of iPhones don't even like the ruling. Comments on the internet seem to overwhelmingly favor Samsung.

In the end, the consumer lost. Samsung put out a product that is just as good or even better than what apple put out, at a much cheaper price. That IS a form of market innovation. The design patents these companies hold and the arguments they made in court were so stupid and in the realm of ridiculous.

This is also a little economics lesson showing how the government is often used to create and enforce monopolies, something people too often blame the free market for...
falc39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:32 PM   #10
christian1923
Y'all ni**** trippin
 
christian1923's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,681
christian1923 has not been impressing people
Default Re: Judge rules in favor of Apple. In Apple vs Samsung trial.

APPLE ALL DAY
christian1923 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:38 PM   #11
falc39
Good High School Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 900
falc39 has decent reputation
Default Re: Judge rules in favor of Apple. In Apple vs Samsung trial.

Quote:
The '301 patent is the so-called "bounce" or "rubber-band" patent, that covers a transient response -- essentially an animation that mimics naturally occurring phenomena, such as a spring. Apple has been granted exclusive rights by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to animate this class of phenomena, oft observed visually in nature.

More surprisingly the jury found Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's U.S. Design Patent No. D618,677 and D593,087, which Apple's attorney's argued in testimony give it exclusive rights to produce rectangular smartphones with rounded edges.

****ing ridiculous lol
falc39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:44 PM   #12
jamal99
Valar Morghulis
 
jamal99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Serbia
Posts: 4,887
jamal99 has an incredible reputation herejamal99 has an incredible reputation herejamal99 has an incredible reputation herejamal99 has an incredible reputation herejamal99 has an incredible reputation herejamal99 has an incredible reputation here
Default Re: Judge rules in favor of Apple. In Apple vs Samsung trial.

Quote:
Originally Posted by falc39
****ing ridiculous lol
I read the whole freaking thing few times and still can't ****ing believe it.

How can they patent phone shape!? Bullshit...

Everyone's getting paid off in this trial...
jamal99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:46 PM   #13
Qwyjibo
Yankee.Hotel.Foxtrot
 
Qwyjibo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,440
Qwyjibo is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterQwyjibo is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterQwyjibo is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterQwyjibo is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterQwyjibo is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterQwyjibo is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterQwyjibo is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterQwyjibo is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterQwyjibo is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterQwyjibo is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterQwyjibo is considered a brilliant InsideHoops poster
Default Re: Judge rules in favor of Apple. In Apple vs Samsung trial.

I keep thinking this is an Onion article.
Qwyjibo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:47 PM   #14
Rockets(T-mac)
NBA sixth man of the year
 
Rockets(T-mac)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,281
Rockets(T-mac) has a terrific reputationRockets(T-mac) has a terrific reputationRockets(T-mac) has a terrific reputationRockets(T-mac) has a terrific reputationRockets(T-mac) has a terrific reputation
Default Re: Judge rules in favor of Apple. In Apple vs Samsung trial.

Quote:
More surprisingly the jury found Samsung guilty of infringing Apple's U.S. Design Patent No. D618,677 and D593,087, which Apple's attorney's argued in testimony give it exclusive rights to produce rectangular smartphones with rounded edges.
Are you ****ing serious? How in the **** did they get such a ridiculous patent?
Rockets(T-mac) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2012, 08:49 PM   #15
christian1923
Y'all ni**** trippin
 
christian1923's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,681
christian1923 has not been impressing people
Default Re: Judge rules in favor of Apple. In Apple vs Samsung trial.

Why do u guys care? I've had Samsung phones. They're pieces of crap
christian1923 is offline   Reply With Quote
This NBA Basketball News Website Sponsored by:
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:08 AM.




NBA Basketball Forum Key Links:
InsideHoops Home
NBA Rumors
Basketball Blog
NBA Daily Recaps
NBA Videos
Fantasy Basketball
NBA Mock Draft
NBA Free Agents
All-Star Weekend
---
High School Basketball
Streetball
---
InsideHoops Twitter
Search Our Site















Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Terms of Use/Service | Privacy Policy