-
NBA lottery pick
How far would the Warriors get if they had to play honest ball against the 1995-96 Bulls?
or the 86 Celtics or 87 Lakers, for that matter.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: How far would the Warriors get if they had to play honest ball against the 1995-96 Bulls?
This Warriors team isn't that good. Neither was last years. They basically only got to the finals because Paul got injured. You should keep this to the 2017 Warriors team. Either way, the 86 celtics are the greatest team of all time...not the 96 bulls.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: How far would the Warriors get if they had to play honest ball against the 1995-96 Bulls?
Curry/Klay can barely dunk
They would get destroyed without the 3-point line to give them an extra point on shots.. Durant made them a legit championship team (they only won in 15' because kyrie was hurt..... and love)
If Curry/Klay walked by a playground where Kareem, Moses, MJ, King and Penny were playing "21" with no threes, they'd just keep walking - they wouldn't belong or be able to compete
-
NBA All-star
Re: How far would the Warriors get if they had to play honest ball against the 1995-96 Bulls?
what the hell do u mean by honest ball? like dray isnt allowed to poke mj in the eyes lol or they just arent allowed to chuck over like 30 3's?
-
Gif-ted
Re: How far would the Warriors get if they had to play honest ball against the 1995-96 Bulls?
Originally Posted by 3ball
Curry/Klay can barely dunk
They would get destroyed without the 3-point line to give them an extra point on shots.. Durant made them a legit championship team (they only won in 15' because kyrie was hurt..... and love)
If they walked by a playground where Kareem, Moses, MJ, King and Penny were playing "21" with no threes, they'd just keep walking - they wouldn't belong or be able to compete
Neither could dumars/isiah, they beat MJ three times straight.
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: How far would the Warriors get if they had to play honest ball against the 1995-96 Bulls?
It's Hard To Say What I Mean What Things Do You Think I Mean.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: How far would the Warriors get if they had to play honest ball against the 1995-96 Bulls?
Originally Posted by bigkingsfan
Neither could dumars/isiah, they beat MJ three times straight.
"they" beat MJ
MJ was going 1 on 5
Of course, Isiah was an elite athlete and far superior to curry/klay
-
Bran Fam Member
Re: How far would the Warriors get if they had to play honest ball against the 1995-96 Bulls?
Originally Posted by Smoke117
This Warriors team isn't that good. Neither was last years. They basically only got to the finals because Paul got injured. You should keep this to the 2017 Warriors team. Either way, the 86 celtics are the greatest team of all time...not the 96 bulls.
Agree with this post in a sense that RS record doesn't determine the "greatest team". The greatest teams faced other great teams/players in the Playoffs and won. 2015 & 2017 Warriors didn't really face anyone good in the Playoffs to even call them the greatest team. They ran through an injured Western Conference and played a much weaker team in the Finals.
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: How far would the Warriors get if they had to play honest ball against the 1995-96 Bulls?
I'm quite confident the Bulls would win, particularly given the rules by which they played. Not to mention, who's beating a defense with armspans of 6-11 Jordan, 7-0 Harper, 7-3 Pippen, plus Rodman.
-
NBA All-star
Re: How far would the Warriors get if they had to play honest ball against the 1995-96 Bulls?
Originally Posted by 72-10
It's Hard To Say What I Mean What Things Do You Think I Mean.
well if they're playing on a truly fair level(like a mind wipe situations where they know none of the modern analytics), they're in trouble but still maybe the 2nd best team in 96 and 86. the 2017 team I'm not as sure however even if I lean no. That team was really good. Pretty much everyone but KD was better on that team and they had a few more useful bench pieces
-
Gif-ted
Re: How far would the Warriors get if they had to play honest ball against the 1995-96 Bulls?
Originally Posted by 3ball
"they" beat MJ
MJ was going 1 on 5
Of course, Isiah was an elite athlete and far superior to curry/klay
Change that goalpost
"Curry/Klay can barely dunk"
-
Good college starter
Re: How far would the Warriors get if they had to play honest ball against the 1995-96 Bulls?
this warriors team is having massive issues with a houston team that don't even really play "basketball"
they just fish for fouls
they've never really looked unbeatable, it's just that the competition is so bad that it is what it is
westbrick and durant should have beaten them a few years ago
-
NBA All-star
Re: How far would the Warriors get if they had to play honest ball against the 1995-96 Bulls?
Originally Posted by paksat
this warriors team is having massive issues with a houston team that don't even really play "basketball"
they just fish for fouls
they've never really looked unbeatable, it's just that the competition is so bad that it is what it is
westbrick and durant should have beaten them a few years ago
... that's a completely different team from this core however. Also why are we acting like durant/westbrook wasnt an elite duo back then lol. Fishing for fouls is cheap but super effective(no play is more efficient than getting fouled on a 3pt attempt)
-
... on a leash
Re: How far would the Warriors get if they had to play honest ball against the 1995-96 Bulls?
Originally Posted by ImKobe
Agree with this post in a sense that RS record doesn't determine the "greatest team". The greatest teams faced other great teams/players in the Playoffs and won. 2015 & 2017 Warriors didn't really face anyone good in the Playoffs to even call them the greatest team. They ran through an injured Western Conference and played a much weaker team in the Finals.
2017 GSW faced a better team than '86 Celtics, '96 Bulls or '01 Lakers ever did, thats for sure.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: How far would the Warriors get if they had to play honest ball against the 1995-96 Bulls?
Originally Posted by 3ball
Curry/Klay can barely dunk
They would get destroyed without the 3-point line to give them an extra point on shots.. Durant made them a legit championship team (they only won in 15' because kyrie was hurt..... and love)
If Curry/Klay walked by a playground where Kareem, Moses, MJ, King and Penny were playing "21" with no threes, they'd just keep walking - they wouldn't belong or be able to compete
Originally Posted by bigkingsfan
Neither could dumars/isiah, they beat MJ three times straight.
Not only that, DJ & Ainge didn't dunk at all for the Celtics, yet they swept MJ twice.
3 ball using the "they can't dunk" argument just shows how dumb he is.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|