The US blew up Russia's pipeline.

[ZenMaster]

How about this?

I remember this moronic nonsense, made by a guy from the military of one of US allies. "If the US had done it, they would have done it a different way"

Last June, the Navy divers, operating under the cover of a widely publicized mid-summer NATO exercise known as BALTOPS 22, planted the remotely triggered explosives that, three months later, destroyed three of the four Nord Stream pipelines, according to a source with direct knowledge of the operational planning.

Back in Washington, planners knew they had to go to Norway. “They hated the Russians, and the Norwegian navy was full of superb sailors and divers who had generations of experience in highly profitable deep-sea oil and gas exploration,” the source said. They also could be trusted to keep the mission secret. (The Norwegians may have had other interests as well. The destruction of Nord Stream—if the Americans could pull it off—would allow Norway to sell vastly more of its own natural gas to Europe.)

https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/...utm_medium=web

[Rolando]

Good to see the truth is finally coming out although it was reasonably obvious from the start who was behind this. Of course, people caught up in the mainstream media spin could not wrap their heads around the idea that the US would execute such a questionable act. It hurt not only Russia but also Germany, one of our closest allies. The current German leadership is so weak that they didn't even protest.

An important goal of the US is to make sure Europe and especially Germany does not develop close economic ties to Russia. A Russia/Germany partnership would be very dangerous and powerful. Pressuring Germany to send Leopard Tanks to Ukraine is also part of this strategy of blocking any future partnership.

[Off the Court]

That's just some journalist blog. I can see that this journalist has prompted Russia to call for an international investigation but before this they had the blast pegged on the UK Navy.

[ZenMaster]

That's just some journalist blog. I can see that this journalist has prompted Russia to call for an international investigation but before this they had the blast pegged on the UK Navy.

Funny how you chose the exact same wording as Reuters when they reported on this.

It's always pretty cool when you can discredit something completely while being as vague as possible, but OK, let's play your retarded game.

What's the angle of your post? The blog, is it place where this journalist, who's broken many stories about wrongdoings by US government through internal sources since the 70's, takes real world events and turn them into fictional story telling and makes money on it?

I predict that within a day or two, either of you or bladed will mention how the story can't be true because the described explosive Tcharges would not create the big explosion that was measured. That's the kind of fake information that are currently making the rounds in the same places where people for whatever reason also all agree that this is "just some blog".

[Off the Court]

Funny how you chose the exact same wording as Reuters when they reported on this.

It's always pretty cool when you can discredit something completely while being as vague as possible, but OK, let's play your retarded game.

What's the angle of your post? The blog, is it place where this journalist, who's broken many stories about wrongdoings by US government through internal sources since the 70's, takes real world events and turn them into fictional story telling and makes money on it?

I predict that within a day or two, either of you or bladed will mention how the story can't be true because the described explosive Tcharges would not create the big explosion that was measured. That's the kind of fake information that are currently making the rounds in the same places where people for whatever reason also all agree that this is "just some blog".

I haven't seen any Reuters article. I haven't even thought about the pipeline for months. Neither me nor you were there so I don't know why you take this to heart or are so attached to this. It's weird.

The angle of my post is that just because this journalist typed something doesn't make it fact.

I predict that you will put your tin foil hat on and internalize as a fact that the US did it no matter what comes out. Just like you did with Arizona audit.

[ZenMaster]

I haven't seen any Reuters article. I haven't even thought about the pipeline for months. Neither me nor you were there so I don't know why you take this to heart or are so attached to this. It's weird.

The angle of my post is that just because this journalist typed something doesn't make it fact.

I predict that you will put your tin foil hat on and internalize as a fact that the US did it no matter what comes out. Just like you did with Arizona audit.

So that observation that an article isn't necessarily true because it's written, it could apply to any person posting any article, but you chose to highlight it for this one specifically. How weird unless you had some ulterior motive like pointing out that you don't think it's true.
And mind you, the author did not just type "the US did it", he draws on a source and through that lays out a pretty detailed set of events which all coincide with events that happened in real life.

I had to be present in the middle of the Baltic sea when it happened in order to care about this? That's also a weird point.

I'm attached to this because it's something that affects the conditions of where I'm currently living. Cheap gas could have flowed through that pipeline, but instead it now has to be sailed over the Atlantic or provided by Norway, just at a much higher price lessening the living conditions for everyone here.
The US carried out a covert attack on a pipeline here, how would you describe it if Russia blew up a US pipeline between say Texas and New York? Act of war or not?

[ZenMaster]

I haven't seen any Reuters article. I haven't even thought about the pipeline for months. Neither me nor you were there so I don't know why you take this to heart or are so attached to this. It's weird.

The angle of my post is that just because this journalist typed something doesn't make it fact.

I predict that you will put your tin foil hat on and internalize as a fact that the US did it no matter what comes out. Just like you did with Arizona audit.

So that observation that an article isn't necessarily true because it's written, it could apply to any person posting any article, but you chose to highlight it for this one specifically. How weird unless you had some ulterior motive like pointing out that you don't think it's true.
And mind you, the author did not just type "the US did it", he draws on a source and through that lays out a pretty detailed set of events which all coincide with events that happened in real life.

I had to be present in the middle of the Baltic sea when it happened in order to care about this? That's also a weird point.

I'm attached to this because it's something that affects the conditions of where I'm currently living. Cheap gas could have flowed through that pipeline, but instead it now has to be sailed over the Atlantic or provided by Norway, just at a much higher price lessening the living conditions for everyone here.
The US carried out a covert attack on a pipeline here, how would you describe it if Russia blew up a US pipeline between say Texas and New York? Act of war or not?

[ZenMaster]

I haven't seen any Reuters article. I haven't even thought about the pipeline for months. Neither me nor you were there so I don't know why you take this to heart or are so attached to this. It's weird.

The angle of my post is that just because this journalist typed something doesn't make it fact.

I predict that you will put your tin foil hat on and internalize as a fact that the US did it no matter what comes out. Just like you did with Arizona audit.

So that observation that an article isn't necessarily true because it's written, it could apply to any person posting any article, but you chose to highlight it for this one specifically. How weird unless you had some ulterior motive like pointing out that you don't think it's true.
And mind you, the author did not just type "the US did it", he draws on a source and through that lays out a pretty detailed set of events which all coincide with events that happened in real life.

I had to be present in the middle of the Baltic sea when it happened in order to care about this? That's also a weird point.

I'm attached to this because it's something that affects the conditions of where I'm currently living, as well as increasing the chance for an escalation into further war. Cheap gas could have flowed through that pipeline in the future, but instead it now HAS to be sailed over the Atlantic or provided by Norway, just at a much higher price that's lessening the living conditions for everyone here.

[ZenMaster]

I haven't seen any Reuters article. I haven't even thought about the pipeline for months. Neither me nor you were there so I don't know why you take this to heart or are so attached to this. It's weird.

The angle of my post is that just because this journalist typed something doesn't make it fact.

I predict that you will put your tin foil hat on and internalize as a fact that the US did it no matter what comes out. Just like you did with Arizona audit.

So that observation that an article isn't necessarily true because it's written, it could apply to any person posting any article, but you chose to highlight it for this one specifically. How weird unless you had some ulterior motive like pointing out that you don't think it's true.
And mind you, the author did not just type "the US did it", he draws on a source and through that lays out a pretty detailed set of events which all coincide with events that happened in real life.

I had to be present in the middle of the Baltic sea when it happened in order to care about this? That's also a weird point.

I'm attached to this because it's something that affects the conditions of where I'm currently living, as well as increasing the chance for an escalation into further war. Cheap gas could have flowed through that pipeline in the future, but instead it now HAS to be sailed over the Atlantic or provided by Norway, just at a much higher price that's lessening the living conditions for everyone here.

[ZenMaster]

I haven't seen any Reuters article. I haven't even thought about the pipeline for months. Neither me nor you were there so I don't know why you take this to heart or are so attached to this. It's weird.

The angle of my post is that just because this journalist typed something doesn't make it fact.

I predict that you will put your tin foil hat on and internalize as a fact that the US did it no matter what comes out. Just like you did with Arizona audit.

So that observation that an article isn't necessarily true because it's written, it could apply to any person posting any article, but you chose to highlight it for this one specifically. How weird unless you had some ulterior motive like pointing out that you don't think it's true.
And mind you, the author did not just type "the US did it", he draws on a source and through that lays out a pretty detailed set of events which all coincide with events that happened in real life.

I had to be present in the middle of the Baltic sea when it happened in order to care about this? That's also a weird point.

I'm attached to this because it's something that affects the conditions of where I'm currently living, as well as increasing the chance for an escalation into further war. Cheap gas could have flowed through that pipeline in the future, but instead it now HAS to be sailed over the Atlantic or provided by Norway, just at a much higher price that's lessening the living conditions for everyone here.

[ZenMaster]

I haven't seen any Reuters article. I haven't even thought about the pipeline for months. Neither me nor you were there so I don't know why you take this to heart or are so attached to this. It's weird.

The angle of my post is that just because this journalist typed something doesn't make it fact.

I predict that you will put your tin foil hat on and internalize as a fact that the US did it no matter what comes out. Just like you did with Arizona audit.

So that observation that an article isn't necessarily true because it's written, it could apply to any person posting any article, but you chose to highlight it for this one specifically. How weird unless you had some ulterior motive like pointing out that you don't think it's true.
And mind you, the author did not just type "the US did it", he draws on a source and through that lays out a pretty detailed set of events which all coincide with events that happened in real life.

I had to be present in the middle of the Baltic sea when it happened in order to care about this? That's also a weird point.

I'm attached to this because it's something that affects the conditions of where I'm currently living, as well as increasing the chance for an escalation into further war. Cheap gas could have flowed through that pipeline in the future, but instead it now HAS to be sailed over the Atlantic or provided by Norway, just at a much higher price that's lessening the living conditions for everyone here.

[ZenMaster]

I haven't seen any Reuters article. I haven't even thought about the pipeline for months. Neither me nor you were there so I don't know why you take this to heart or are so attached to this. It's weird.

The angle of my post is that just because this journalist typed something doesn't make it fact.

I predict that you will put your tin foil hat on and internalize as a fact that the US did it no matter what comes out. Just like you did with Arizona audit.

So that observation that an article isn't necessarily true because it's written, it could apply to any person posting any article, but you chose to highlight it for this one specifically. How weird unless you had some ulterior motive like pointing out that you don't think it's true.
And mind you, the author did not just type "the US did it", he draws on a source and through that lays out a pretty detailed set of events which all coincide with events that happened in real life.

I had to be present in the middle of the Baltic sea when it happened in order to care about this? That's also a weird point.

I'm attached to this because it's something that affects the conditions of where I'm currently living, as well as increasing the chance for an escalation into further war. Cheap gas could have flowed through that pipeline in the future, but instead it now HAS to be sailed over the Atlantic or provided by Norway, just at a much higher price that's lessening the living conditions for everyone here.

[ZenMaster]

I haven't seen any Reuters article. I haven't even thought about the pipeline for months. Neither me nor you were there so I don't know why you take this to heart or are so attached to this. It's weird.

The angle of my post is that just because this journalist typed something doesn't make it fact.

I predict that you will put your tin foil hat on and internalize as a fact that the US did it no matter what comes out. Just like you did with Arizona audit.

So that observation that an article isn't necessarily true because it's written, it could apply to any person posting any article, but you chose to highlight it for this one specifically. How weird unless you had some ulterior motive like pointing out that you don't think it's true.
And mind you, the author did not just type "the US did it", he draws on a source and through that lays out a pretty detailed set of events which all coincide with events that happened in real life.

I had to be present in the middle of the Baltic sea when it happened in order to care about this? That's also a weird point.

I'm attached to this because it's something that affects the conditions of where I'm currently living, as well as increasing the chance for an escalation into further war. Cheap gas could have flowed through that pipeline in the future, but instead it now HAS to be sailed over the Atlantic or provided by Norway, just at a much higher price that's lessening the living conditions for everyone here.

[Nanners]

This supercut sums it up the situation so phenomenally that it can break the brains of the most indoctrinated of NPCs



You have to be literally retarded to believe that Russia blew up their own pipeline

BTW, the Biden admin basically declared war on Russia with this act of terrorism, so when we all die in the upcoming nuclear holocaust be sure to thank the nearest democrat for your fate