Has Anyone Had As Many Injuries As D-Rose Wearing Nikes???

[nathanjizzle]

nike should buy derrick roses contract. that would be a dream

[r15mohd]

nike should buy derrick roses contract. that would be a dream

he's not so lucky...Nike is definitely not taking that risk. a dream is where it'll remain.

anyhoo...wearing Nike's now isn't going to magically stabilize DRose, I doubt at this point in his career, any shoe will prevent any further injury from occurring. what's done is done IMO.

I wonder if he reached out to guys like Adrian Peterson...coming back from similar injuries to an even more injury prone sport, that's his best option going forward in rehab for longevity

[chocolatethunder]

I cannot believe the stupidity in this thread. While shoes w lots of arch support it no arch support could cause problems like PF in some people, the likelihood of his shoes causing his acl injury and subsequent injuries are very small. What is much more likely is that he has a biomechanical problem (some type of imbalance) that caused his first injury and a resulting imbalamce from that injury that is helping cause these subsequent injuries. That happens sometimes with guys who suffer big injuries in their legs and back. FILA didn't injure grant Hill and Nike didnt injure Durant and Oden and Bynum.

[nathanjizzle]

I cannot believe the stupidity in this thread. While shoes w lots of arch support it no arch support could cause problems like PF in some people, the likelihood of his shoes causing his acl injury and subsequent injuries are very small. What is much more likely is that he has a biomechanical problem (some type of imbalance) that caused his first injury and a resulting imbalamce from that injury that is helping cause these subsequent injuries. That happens sometimes with guys who suffer big injuries in their legs and back. FILA didn't injure grant Hill and Nike didnt injure Durant and Oden and Bynum.

adidas has a higher injury rate than anyone. where is gilbert arenas and tracy mcgrady these days?

[r15mohd]

I cannot believe the stupidity in this thread. While shoes w lots of arch support it no arch support could cause problems like PF in some people, the likelihood of his shoes causing his acl injury and subsequent injuries are very small. What is much more likely is that he has a biomechanical problem (some type of imbalance) that caused his first injury and a resulting imbalamce from that injury that is helping cause these subsequent injuries. That happens sometimes with guys who suffer big injuries in their legs and back. FILA didn't injure grant Hill and Nike didnt injure Durant and Oden and Bynum.

though small...it can't be overlooked. but your indication of the imbalance is certainly possible given the favoritism to his knees. usually it's favoring one side to the other, and the other leg fatiguing due to over-compensation. in his case it's favoring both knees, so who knows really. he's just unfortunate

[chocolatethunder]

though small...it can't be overlooked. but your indication of the imbalance is certainly possible given the favoritism to his knees. usually it's favoring one side to the other, and the other leg fatiguing due to over-compensation. in his case it's favoring both knees, so who knows really. he's just unfortunate

Yes it can be overlooked because people have injuries all the time and play in all kinds of shoes. This is just some bullshit theory that a bunch of uninformed kids picked up on and won't let go of. The guy suffered one injury that led to a bunch of subsequent injuries, that has nothing to do with his shoes. Yao had foot injuries so it must surely have been his shoes right? And T-Mac's that must have been his shoes as well? And Oden? And Bynum? and Brandon Roy? Penny? People get injuries all the time. This is a very obvious case of a guy getting injured and compensating and causing other injuries. A succession of injuries stemming from one injury is not uncommon and happens all the time. Why everyone wants to put it down to Roses shoes is totally stupid and not fair to him and pointless.

[r15mohd]

Yes it can be overlooked because people have injuries all the time and play in all kinds of shoes. This is just some bullshit theory that a bunch of uninformed kids picked up on and won't let go of. The guy suffered one injury that led to a bunch of subsequent injuries, that has nothing to do with his shoes. Yao had foot injuries so it must surely have been his shoes right? And T-Mac's that must have been his shoes as well? And Oden? And Bynum? and Brandon Roy? Penny? People get injuries all the time. This is a very obvious case of a guy getting injured and compensating and causing other injuries. A succession of injuries stemming from one injury is not uncommon and happens all the time. Why everyone wants to put it down to Roses shoes is totally stupid and not fair to him and pointless.

i don't doubt that the overcompensation point, however it is pretty bold not to even question it when the shoe basically gave loose

what's the scenario on possibly a wet floor?

[kuzdeen]

i don't doubt that the overcompensation point, however it is pretty bold not to even question it when the shoe basically gave loose

[COLOR="Red"]what's the scenario on possibly a wet floor?[/COLOR]

imo, with derrick rose's injuries, i think the bulls management would be very careful whenever he's on the floor and the ball boys or the guys that mop wet spots should constantly be on the look out, if they are not, then they are failing him.

[nathanjizzle]

i don't doubt that the overcompensation point, however it is pretty bold not to even question it when the shoe basically gave loose

what's the scenario on possibly a wet floor?

if it was a wetspot then would he really had a hamstring injury. looking at that gif, the right edge of his shoe should have dampened more and not allowing his ankle to bend at a hard angle.

[ABG]

Yes it can be overlooked because people have injuries all the time and play in all kinds of shoes. This is just some bullshit theory that a bunch of uninformed kids picked up on and won't let go of. The guy suffered one injury that led to a bunch of subsequent injuries, that has nothing to do with his shoes. Yao had foot injuries so it must surely have been his shoes right? And T-Mac's that must have been his shoes as well? And Oden? And Bynum? and Brandon Roy? Penny? People get injuries all the time. This is a very obvious case of a guy getting injured and compensating and causing other injuries. A succession of injuries stemming from one injury is not uncommon and happens all the time. Why everyone wants to put it down to Roses shoes is totally stupid and not fair to him and pointless.

preach.

[chocolatethunder]

i don't doubt that the overcompensation point, however it is pretty bold not to even question it when the shoe basically gave loose

what's the scenario on possibly a wet floor?

High top shoes don't reduce ankle injuries. Taping does though. Its's not his shoes. It's actually better for your foot if the shoe did give out and allow your ankle to roll the way it would naturally. So no, it's not his shoes. Listen, injuries can also occur on turf, grass, hardwood, etc from stopping or doing some movement that is just exacerbated by any shoe, cleat, whatever on that surface. His foot got hung up on the floor, it happens.

No, it's stupidly bold to be a sheep and think that it must be his shoes. This is just ridiculous. My friend who is a brain surgeon at OSU and a basketball junkie said to me two weeks ago "Rose is hurt again, he's done." And went on to say exactly what I'm saying. That he's going to be plagued with injuries from his first injury. I'll trust my common sense and the opinion of a brain surgeon over a bunch of zit faced morons.

[poido123]

i don't doubt that the overcompensation point, however it is pretty bold not to even question it when the shoe basically gave loose

what's the scenario on possibly a wet floor?

Watching that replay, it looked like a small ankle tweak.

I feel relieved, that doesn't look like a hamstring strain or a knee.

[iznogood]

I cannot believe the stupidity in this thread. While shoes w lots of arch support it no arch support could cause problems like PF in some people, the likelihood of his shoes causing his acl injury and subsequent injuries are very small. What is much more likely is that he has a biomechanical problem (some type of imbalance) that caused his first injury and a resulting imbalamce from that injury that is helping cause these subsequent injuries. That happens sometimes with guys who suffer big injuries in their legs and back. FILA didn't injure grant Hill and Nike didnt injure Durant and Oden and Bynum.

Noah wore bogus ass le coq de sportiff. Mainly because his dad wore them. They are mainly tennis shoes. He had planter flasciutus. He actually sued them. Lol.

He sued them because they owed him money. As for PF, he just says he believes they might contributed to his development of PF. The correlation was not confirmed and the shoe quality was not the reason he sued the company for. I actually owned a pair of his shoes and they were decent. They were built closer to the 90s basketball shoes so that means no fancy cushioning (which can be counterproductive), but the quality of the materials was much better than what you would get on your retro Js and many players play in those. Not to mention that a lot of NBA players play in foamposites which are terrible to play basketball in and they do just fine.

[2swift4u]

Yes it can be overlooked because people have injuries all the time and play in all kinds of shoes. This is just some bullshit theory that a bunch of uninformed kids picked up on and won't let go of. The guy suffered one injury that led to a bunch of subsequent injuries, that has nothing to do with his shoes. Yao had foot injuries so it must surely have been his shoes right? And T-Mac's that must have been his shoes as well? And Oden? And Bynum? and Brandon Roy? Penny? People get injuries all the time. This is a very obvious case of a guy getting injured and compensating and causing other injuries. A succession of injuries stemming from one injury is not uncommon and happens all the time. Why everyone wants to put it down to Roses shoes is totally stupid and not fair to him and pointless.

I don't think it's that far-fetched to be honest. I've played in a ton of differents shoes & brands and trust me it can make a big difference. Don't get me wrong I don't believe you're going to tear your acl by playing in Adidas or any other brand because that has some other reasons as you correctly mentioned but what happened to Rose the other night clearly looks like a shoe-issue to me. Furthermore if I remember correctly he sprained his ankle as soon as he put on those cut-down Adidas Crazylights 2-3 years ago. I think he never wore them again afterwards.

[chocolatethunder]

Nikes undisputed goat shoes.

Tonight looks like those cheap addidas of roses made him slip and now he got hamstring injury.


Addidas are pieces of shit.

Just typin, is it a coincidence rose gettin hurt so much?

I can't remember any nike wearing player having this many injuries.

It's Adidas you moron not Addidas. It's named after the company's founder Adi Dassler. "aid das" Get it? I knew you would because you're smart.