The GOAT impact on a bad team

[3ball]

LeBron James faced a Celtics team that, when even unhealthy, took the championship Lakers to 7.

What a joke - you think the Celtics losing to the Lakers is an EXCUSE for Lebron losing to them?

You don't even realize how dumb that is... Essentially, any time Lebron loses, the excuse is "b-b-but they had a good team."... Lebron stans are literally the DUMBEST fans on earth.

Jordan had the least impact out of all the insane statistical seasons in 1989.

MJ led a 6-seed to the ECF in 1989, while Lebron lost in 2nd Round with a 1-seed in 2010 - this proves Lebron's stats are the empty ones that result in underachievement..

Whereas MJ never lost as a 1-seed (he won the championship every year he was the 1-seed) and never underachieved his seeding EVER.. MJ's teams virtually never underacheived - never underachieving is the opposite of stat-padding.

1989 was just a selfish, stat-crazed, sub-optimal season for MJ.

MJ had GOAT stats for his entire career, so that means his entire career was "just a selfish, stat-crazed and sub-optimal", as you said.... that resulted in 6/6... Whew - what a selfish player..

In 1989, MJ led a would-be lottery team to the ECF and 1 season away from the start of a 3-peat.. That's the GOAT impact on a bad team...

And of course, we already know MJ had the GOAT impact on a good team - the Bulls fell from 3-peat to 2nd Round with him, which is the biggest 1-season decline ever when a star player leaves the team.

[warriorfan]

Bulls were a bad team until MJ joined and they went 6/6.

How is this not GOAT impact on a bad team?