| 
  
		
		
	 
	
	
		
			
	
	
		
			
			
				NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
			
			
			
			
			 
			
				
 
					    
				 
			
				
				
				
					 #1 criteria for evaluating players - ELEVATING TEAMMATES
					
						
							Every single player, coach and analyst says this.. Among non-big men - Bird, Magic, and MJ elevated teammates better than anyone.. Kobe does well too - the story was never that his teammates underperformed.
 Otoh, the story is ALWAYS how Lebron's teammates underperform - this is because he turns them into play-finishers and their predictable play-finishing roles no longer succeed against the best teams in the playoffs.
 
 This inferior brand of basketball that Lebron imposes on his team is why his team/supporting cast underperforms - it's like clockwork... 2/7 anyone?.. Utimately, this is why he isn't a top 10 all-time player.
 .
 
				
				
				
					
						Last edited by 3ball; 01-22-2016 at 04:31 AM.
					
					
				 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: #1 criteria for evaluating players - ELEVATING TEAMMATES
					
						
							You always tell us how poor Scottie played, and how little help MJ has. 
 Like Scottie shooting 35% and only scoring 15ppg against the Sonics. Not to mention calling it the WOAT help, and giving a numerous amount of other examples.
 
 So I guess we can say that Jordan isn't in that category and made his teammates significantly worse.
 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: #1 criteria for evaluating players - ELEVATING TEAMMATES
					
						
							
	slayed
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by plowking You always tell us how poor Scottie played, and how little help MJ has. 
 Like Scottie shooting 35% and only scoring 15ppg against the Sonics. Not to mention calling it the WOAT help, and giving a numerous amount of other examples.
 
 So I guess we can say that Jordan isn't in that category and made his teammates significantly worse.
   
	
	
		
			
			
				NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
			
			
			
			
			 
			
				
 
					    
				 
			
				
				
				
					 Re: #1 criteria for evaluating players - ELEVATING TEAMMATES
					
						
							
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by plowking You always tell us how poor Scottie played, and how little help MJ has. 
 Like Scottie shooting 35% and only scoring 15ppg against the Sonics. Not to mention calling it the WOAT help, and giving a numerous amount of other examples.
 
 So I guess we can say that Jordan isn't in that category and made his teammates significantly worse.
 Wrong.
 
 Scottie was hot garbage before Jordan, this is a known fact.
 
 Scottie still wasn't the greatest even with the Jordan factor but still, if you are gonna try to tell us with a straight face that Scottie would of been better with out Jordan you are just trolling.
 
 Scottie wasn't great but with out Jordan? He would of been straight shithouse material.
 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: #1 criteria for evaluating players - ELEVATING TEAMMATES
					
						
							
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by plowking You always tell us how poor Scottie played, and how little help MJ has. 
 Like Scottie shooting 35% and only scoring 15ppg against the Sonics. Not to mention calling it the WOAT help, and giving a numerous amount of other examples.
 
 So I guess we can say that Jordan isn't in that category and made his teammates significantly worse.
   
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: #1 criteria for evaluating players - ELEVATING TEAMMATES
					
						
							
	You can't say that hypothetical crap. What is a fact is Scottie led a 55 win team without Jordan
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by warriorfan Wrong.
 Scottie was hot garbage before Jordan, this is a known fact.
 
 Scottie still wasn't the greatest even with the Jordan factor but still, if you are gonna try to tell us with a straight face that Scottie would of been better with out Jordan you are just trolling.
 
 Scottie wasn't great but with out Jordan? He would of been straight shithouse material.
 
	
	
		
			
			
				NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
			
			
			
			
			 
			
				
 
					    
				 
			
				
				
				
					 Re: #1 criteria for evaluating players - ELEVATING TEAMMATES
					
						
							
	After getting tutored by the Greatest Player to ever play the game, day in and day out for close to a decade.
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by AirBonner You can't say that hypothetical crap. What is a fact is Scottie led a 55 win team without Jordan 
 You finna act like Jordan didn't have an imprint on that?
 
 
   
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: #1 criteria for evaluating players - ELEVATING TEAMMATES
					
						
							
	I think its mutual thing bud. MJ wasn't winning anything before him
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by warriorfan After getting tutored by the Greatest Player to ever play the game, day in and day out for close to a decade. 
You finna act like Jordan didn't have an imprint on that?
  
	
	
		
			
			
				NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
			
			
			
			
			 
			
				
 
					    
				 
			
				
				
				
					 Re: #1 criteria for evaluating players - ELEVATING TEAMMATES
					
						
							
	Yeah Jordan got just as much benefit from playing with Pippen as Pippen did with Jordan.
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by AirBonner I think its mutual thing bud. MJ wasn't winning anything before him 
 You have exposed yourself as a troll. You can get the f[COLOR="Black"]u[/COLOR]ck out now.
 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: #1 criteria for evaluating players - ELEVATING TEAMMATES
					
						
							
	REKT
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by plowking You always tell us how poor Scottie played, and how little help MJ has. 
 Like Scottie shooting 35% and only scoring 15ppg against the Sonics. Not to mention calling it the WOAT help, and giving a numerous amount of other examples.
 
 So I guess we can say that Jordan isn't in that category and made his teammates significantly worse.
 
 
 @warriorsfan, if MJ was so good at developing players, why haven't we seen more Pippen's?
 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: #1 criteria for evaluating players - ELEVATING TEAMMATES
					
						
							#1 criteria should be how high was a player's on court impact.
 that's why I have Olajuwon comfortably in the Top5
 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: #1 criteria for evaluating players - ELEVATING TEAMMATES
					
						
							Bulls without Jordan - 55 winsLebron James on the Heat in his final year - 54 wins
 
 So Jordan essentially lost to the Magic with a team better than the 2014 Miami Heat. Meanwhile Bron was able to get a worse team to the final.
 
 Bron making his teammates better once again.
 
	
	
		
			
			
				NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
			
			
			
			
			 
			
				
 
					    
				 
			
				
				
				
					 Re: #1 criteria for evaluating players - ELEVATING TEAMMATES
					
						
							
	Thats not how it works. Pippen was inherently talented but lacked the Alphaness to maximize the most out of his talents. Jordan's lead and mentoring let him maximize the most out of his god given tools.
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by aj1987 REKT
 
 @warriorsfan, if MJ was so good at developing players, why haven't we seen more Pippen's?
 
 If anyone wants to sit here and say that Pippen would of been just as good of a player with out ever playing with MJ...They are being ridiculous.
 
	
	
		
			
			
				NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
			
			
			
			
			 
			
				
 
					    
				 
			
				
				
				
					 Re: #1 criteria for evaluating players - ELEVATING TEAMMATES
					
						
							
	[COLOR="Navy"]Jordan's team won every series where Pippen played poorly - in those series, Jordan simply carried the team and didn't worry about Pippen.
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by plowking You always tell us how poor Scottie played, and how little help MJ has.
 
 Like Scottie shooting 35% and only scoring 15ppg against the Sonics. Not to mention calling it the WOAT help, and giving a numerous amount of other examples.
 
 So I guess we can say that Jordan isn't in that category and made his teammates significantly worse.
 
 
 But anytime Jordan needed Pippen to play well to win the series, he made sure Pippen was playing well[/COLOR].
 
 There was only a ONE game where Scottie's poor performance caused the Bulls to lose, and Jordan was helpless to do anything about it - this was Pippen's epic choke in Game 7 of ECF (1-10 for 2 points), where Pippen admitted the pressure got to him.. Not much MJ could do about that.
 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: #1 criteria for evaluating players - ELEVATING TEAMMATES
					
						
							
	So, what happened during the 2nd 3peat? MJ stopped pushing him? Also, what about the dozens of other athletic players? He couldn't develop them into at least Kevin Martin level offensive players? How about Bill Cartwright? Luc Longley? Bosh was a better rebounder than them.
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by warriorfan Thats not how it works. Pippen was inherently talented but lacked the Alphaness to maximize the most out of his talents. Jordan's lead and mentoring let him maximize the most out of his god given tools. 
 If anyone wants to sit here and say that Pippen would of been just as good of a player with out ever playing with MJ...They are being ridiculous.
 
				
				
				
					
						Last edited by aj1987; 01-22-2016 at 05:34 AM.
					
					
				 
 
	
	
 
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
				 Posting Permissions
				
	
		You may not post new threadsYou may not post repliesYou may not post attachmentsYou may not edit your posts  Forum Rules 
  
  
 
 
 |