Which network will interview Kuhmalla first?

[AlternativeAcc.]

Remember - Kamala has gotten a MASSIVE and artificial boost in the polls since Biden dropped out. Novelty + excitement + mystery + DNC = Kamala leading slightly in polls.

By the time the election rolls around, this lead will have vanished, and Trump will win in a near landslide. Biden had a 9 point lead pre-election in 2020, and ended up winning by mere thousands of votes in swing states.

After the debate, I expect Trump to gain the lead which will set the stage for the landslide.



Buckle up puccies, Trump is the next president.

[Lakers Legend#32]

Waiting for Trump to do a same style interview---but not on FOX News.

[diamenz]

Edit: nevermind, i'm confused.

[Bill Gates]

Remember - Kamala has gotten a MASSIVE and artificial boost in the polls since Biden dropped out. Novelty + excitement + mystery + DNC = Kamala leading slightly in polls.

By the time the election rolls around, this lead will have vanished, and Trump will win in a near landslide. Biden had a 9 point lead pre-election in 2020, and ended up winning by mere thousands of votes in swing states.

After the debate, I expect Trump to gain the lead which will set the stage for the landslide.



Buckle up puccies, Trump is the next president.

According to 538 they adjusted their poll weighting to reflect they should have done it in the 2020 election and most believe that Kamala is saving her big "excitement" for last with either Beyonce or Swift or both.

[Bill Gates]

Trump knows he is in danger so he is starting to flip-flop on abortion.

The silent majority is seems to be pro-choicers coming out to vote. Massive surge in black women voter registrations.

[bladefd]

Remember - Kamala has gotten a MASSIVE and artificial boost in the polls since Biden dropped out. Novelty + excitement + mystery + DNC = Kamala leading slightly in polls.

By the time the election rolls around, this lead will have vanished, and Trump will win in a near landslide. Biden had a 9 point lead pre-election in 2020, and ended up winning by mere thousands of votes in swing states.

After the debate, I expect Trump to gain the lead which will set the stage for the landslide.



Buckle up puccies, Trump is the next president.

Like in 2020, right?

And like the red waves that took place in 2018 and 2022?

[Patrick Chewing]

Edit: nevermind, i'm confused.

You have been as of late.

[ILLsmak]

I just saw the interview. Not really sure she did well. Does anyone think she did well?

They were both sweating. Serious questions, but they weren't posed in a combative way. Still, neither of them really had an answer to their 'flaws.'

-Smak

[Dbrog]

I just saw the interview. Not really sure she did well. Does anyone think she did well?

They were both sweating. Serious questions, but they weren't posed in a combative way. Still, neither of them really had an answer to their 'flaws.'

-Smak

I'm baffled how someone could see this interview and not be unsettled.

You can look at BBCs fact checker and see that every single thing Harris said was a lie or a half truth. Many people gave a harsh criticism of Trump when he did the same. At least with Biden he would mostly speak truth when he was coherent.

Most of this was Harris insisting shes not changed despite Dana quoting Harris in the past. She would often avoid the question altogether like when asked about immigration and started talking about how she's faught it despite Dana talking about record numbers of illegal crossings.

Dana asked her what she would say to people who want to go back to Trumps economy that was better and she said it wasn't and that she "rescued people" from it. Not exactly what a voter with that mindset would want to hear.

She didn't outline any policies except to say she wants to move forward with fixing prices (despite every economist and history saying this is a bad idea), and allocate money for down payment assistance and child credits without saying how this would be funded. Her explanation for changing her mind kn fracking was literally "I saw that we were achieving results without stopping it." If you care about the environment, why would you say this? Can't we make even MORE progress if we cut a source of the issue?

And finally the most puzzling and somewhat disturbing thing to me was her comment about this country being on a "bad path" which started 10 years ago. You realize 6 of those years were your own party with 4 being you (which Dana brought up) and the other two being one of the most beloved democratic president's ever for the party. Why would she even say this? Is it not weird to everyone else?

I'd give this interview a D- just cause she get points for coming across well when talking about Joe

[TheMan]

Remember - Kamala has gotten a MASSIVE and artificial boost in the polls since Biden dropped out. Novelty + excitement + mystery + DNC = Kamala leading slightly in polls.

By the time the election rolls around, this lead will have vanished, and Trump will win in a near landslide. Biden had a 9 point lead pre-election in 2020, and ended up winning by mere thousands of votes in swing states.

After the debate, I expect Trump to gain the lead which will set the stage for the landslide.



Buckle up puccies, Trump is the next president.

There isn't a landslide coming, neither for Trump nor Harris.

Gonna come down to ground game, who turns out their base and ultimately whether people want Trump back.

Could go either way but I'm calling Harris in an upset and Trump's win in 16 will be seen as a fluke by historians.

Edit; Trump hasn't been able to break the 47% national vote in his previous two tries and I don't see him doing it that this time around either, tough to win it all when you can't get near 50%.

[ILLsmak]

There isn't a landslide coming, neither for Trump nor Harris.

Gonna come down to ground game, who turns out their base and ultimately whether people want Trump back.

Could go either way but I'm calling Harris in an upset and Trump's win in 16 will be seen as a fluke by historians.

Edit; Trump hasn't been able to break the 47% national vote in his previous two tries and I don't see him doing it that this time around either, tough to win it all when you can't get near 50%.

It’s not exactly mathematically necessary (or is it?) but if she indeed carries georgia again, that’s tough for DT.

-Smak

[Patrick Chewing]

There isn't a landslide coming, neither for Trump nor Harris.

Gonna come down to ground game, who turns out their base and ultimately whether people want Trump back.

Could go either way but I'm calling Harris in an upset and Trump's win in 16 will be seen as a fluke by historians.

Edit; Trump hasn't been able to break the 47% national vote in his previous two tries and I don't see him doing it that this time around either, tough to win it all when you can't get near 50%.

Let's make a wager. Cause there's no way that cackling idiot is winning.

[AlternativeAcc.]

There isn't a landslide coming, neither for Trump nor Harris.

Gonna come down to ground game, who turns out their base and ultimately whether people want Trump back.

Could go either way but I'm calling Harris in an upset and Trump's win in 16 will be seen as a fluke by historians.

Edit; Trump hasn't been able to break the 47% national vote in his previous two tries and I don't see him doing it that this time around either, tough to win it all when you can't get near 50%.

Cool. Whats your address?

I'm getting sick of people talking shit about Trump. I'll speak with my ****ing hands from here on out.

[ILLsmak]

Cool. Whats your address?

I'm getting sick of people talking shit about Trump. I'll speak with my ****ing hands from here on out.

haha Jay and Silent bob shit. You picked the wrong guy, tho, he's not really talked much shit about Trump. Not compared to some of the other people here. He's just giving his PoV.

-Smak

[TheMan]

Cool. Whats your address?

I'm getting sick of people talking shit about Trump. I'll speak with my ****ing hands from here on out.

Why would you need my address? Lol, you wanna trade hands over two goofy politicians? Get a life, bro.