Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    NBA All-star
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    9,486

    Default What would happen if NBA got rid of 3 pointers entirely?

    Let's play a game.

    People suggest sometimes getting rid of 3s entirely to "fix" the NBA, but it always seem like a joke, but what if it actually happened?

    What would the league and the game look like if you could not make that extra point from distance?

    I think it would lead to a lot more fastbreaks. Post ups. Early mid range shots.

  2. #2
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    33,229

    Default Re: What would happen if NBA got rid of 3 pointers entirely?

    would still bang walk on water's mom

  3. #3
    Please clap.
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    30,231

    Default Re: What would happen if NBA got rid of 3 pointers entirely?

    Jesus would return to Earth.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    3,390

    Default Re: What would happen if NBA got rid of 3 pointers entirely?

    Quote Originally Posted by 90sgoat View Post
    Let's play a game.

    People suggest sometimes getting rid of 3s entirely to "fix" the NBA, but it always seem like a joke, but what if it actually happened?

    What would the league and the game look like if you could not make that extra point from distance?

    I think it would lead to a lot more fastbreaks. Post ups. Early mid range shots.

    A lot of players today don't have the skill set to score inside. If they tried playing against the 1980s teams, they would get demolished.

  5. #5
    NBA All-star
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    9,486

    Default Re: What would happen if NBA got rid of 3 pointers entirely?

    Quote Originally Posted by Real Men Wear Green View Post
    Jesus would return to Earth.
    MJ in basketball clothes?

  6. #6
    XXL
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    24,145

    Default Re: What would happen if NBA got rid of 3 pointers entirely?

    The game would be way more balanced. Some might think the style of play would revert to the 1960s and '70s but that wouldn't happen. So many other things aside from the three-point line have changed: the dribbling, carrying, traveling interpretations, illegal screens, three in the key, five seconds back to the basket, etc.

    The post-up would be utilized more for sure. You'd still have plenty of ball screens on and off the ball. The pick-and-roll game and hand-off sets would still be heavily used. Perimeter shooting would be used and extend far enough out to open up the paint, just like it has always been in NBA history.

    What we have to understand is that, yes, shots closer to the basket are higher percentage and lead to more second chance opportunities. But they're more contested and generate more turnovers. Whereas although perimeter shots further from the basket are lower percentage they're less contested, result in fewer turnovers, and space the floor.

    A lot of the best team offenses and offensive players in NBA history were perimeter-based, even before the introduction of the three-point line. Boston in the '50s with Cousy, Sharman, and Macauley. Kansas City in the '60s with Oscar Robertson running the pick-and-roll. Golden State in the '70s with Rick Barry.

    Guys like Curry and Klay would still be supremely valuable.

  7. #7
    I buy YOU out
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    40,066

    Default Re: What would happen if NBA got rid of 3 pointers entirely?

    They should remove it for at least a few years to encourage different offensive schemes.

  8. #8
    College star
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    4,135

    Default Re: What would happen if NBA got rid of 3 pointers entirely?

    Same travel and soft calls? Those are part of the problem.

  9. #9
    ...
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    18,135

    Default Re: What would happen if NBA got rid of 3 pointers entirely?

    Other things stay the same? We'll see lots and lots of boring free throw show.

  10. #10
    NBA All-star
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    9,486

    Default Re: What would happen if NBA got rid of 3 pointers entirely?

    Quote Originally Posted by Im Still Ballin View Post
    The game would be way more balanced. Some might think the style of play would revert to the 1960s and '70s but that wouldn't happen. So many other things aside from the three-point line have changed: the dribbling, carrying, traveling interpretations, illegal screens, three in the key, five seconds back to the basket, etc.

    The post-up would be utilized more for sure. You'd still have plenty of ball screens on and off the ball. The pick-and-roll game and hand-off sets would still be heavily used. Perimeter shooting would be used and extend far enough out to open up the paint, just like it has always been in NBA history.

    What we have to understand is that, yes, shots closer to the basket are higher percentage and lead to more second chance opportunities. But they're more contested and generate more turnovers. Whereas although perimeter shots further from the basket are lower percentage they're less contested, result in fewer turnovers, and space the floor.

    A lot of the best team offenses and offensive players in NBA history were perimeter-based, even before the introduction of the three-point line. Boston in the '50s with Cousy, Sharman, and Macauley. Kansas City in the '60s with Oscar Robertson running the pick-and-roll. Golden State in the '70s with Rick Barry.

    Guys like Curry and Klay would still be supremely valuable.
    Those who would suffer the most are the lanklet wings.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •