Wtf is no kings?

[TheMan]

Assuming Trump totally shits the bed and has a disastrous term, that doesn't mean it would automatically set the table for the democrats. You can afford to play bad when the other team is playing worse.

Even if people decide it's time to move on from Trump, I can't image they'd be willing to settle for communism and all the other weird shit on the progressive agenda. So long as they keep moving further left I would guess republicans have little to worry about. It would require a total revamp of the party for the dems to start gaining momentum.

You are so full of it. The Democrats are nowhere near being socialist, let alone communist. The only social democrat is Bernie Sanders and he's not even a Democrat. And yeah dude, when Trump ends his term horrifically, the spineless Democrats will gain full power and proceed to not actually do anything of significance but clean up the GOP's mess, it's been the cycle the last 50 years. Clinton fixes the mess created by Reagan/Bush I, Obama fixes the mess GWB left behind, Biden started to right the ship after Trump's first term but apparently not quickly enough as Trump is busy now burying the American Empire for good...

If there's one thing to take away from the last 50 years, the Republicans are horrendous in power, the Democrats just suck less.

From Google AI

Studies have analyzed the economic performance of both Democratic and Republican presidential administrations in the United States, and generally find that the economy tends to perform better under Democratic administrations.
Here's a summary of the key findings:
GDP Growth: The economy has, on average, grown faster under Democratic presidents. For example, studies show that annual real GDP growth has been higher during Democratic administrations compared to Republican ones.
Job Growth: Democratic presidents have overseen, on average, higher job creation rates. This includes higher rates of total job growth and especially private sector job growth.
Unemployment: The unemployment rate tends to be lower at the end of Democratic presidencies and higher at the end of Republican presidencies.
Recessions: Nearly all recessions in the modern era (since World War II) have begun under Republican presidents.
Manufacturing: Manufacturing job growth and investment have been greater under Democratic presidents.
Small Business Creation: Small business creation has been higher under recent Democratic administrations.
Income Growth: Income growth, particularly for lower-income families, tends to be faster under Democratic presidents.
National Debt: While both parties have overseen increases in the national debt, studies suggest that more was added under recent Republican presidencies, largely due to tax cuts that favored the wealthy and corporations.

Go to sleep, bro.

[Baller234]

TheMan proceeds to write an essay about how stupid I am but leads with the following sentences:

You are so full of it. The Democrats are nowhere near being socialist, let alone communist. The only social democrat is Bernie Sanders and he's not even a Democrat.

Every word of this is untrue.

Sanders is a democrat. He can call himself whatever he wants but he's listed as a democrat. He ran as a democrat and he campaigns for democrats. And no he's not the only one. He's spiritually aligned with AOC who right now is arguably the face of the entire progressive movement. If she runs for president, she would be running as a democrat.

So yes, the democrats are actually very close to being a socialist party. I'm sorry if their brand of socialism doesn't match up perfectly with whatever version you've concocted in your imagination, but Bernie literally refers to himself as a socialist.

As we speak AOC is campaigning for a socialist for mayor of NYC.

[ArbitraryWater]

Its like the most obvious PsyOp ever

[Off the Court]

Its like the most obvious PsyOp ever

[BurningHammer]

Its like the most obvious PsyOp ever

I guess it works better than AfD then