Page 7 of 12 FirstFirst ... 45678910 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 166
  1. #91
    Embiid > Jokic SouBeachTalents's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    28,834

    Default Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le

    Quote Originally Posted by warriorfan View Post
    Dude is some nerd who never played basketball and says KG is top 10 of all time

    Invalidates anything he says. Not even gonna listen to any of that nonsense. Also funny you have such a low ball iq and normal iq you can’t even articulate your own ideas in your own words.

    Yikes.
    Tbf though you were genuinely arguing for a while Chris Bosh was better than still prime/FMVP Kobe, that's worse than claiming KG is top 10 all time.

  2. #92
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 1987_Lakers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    26,457

    Default Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le

    Quote Originally Posted by warriorfan View Post
    Yeah, you were an obese kid who never hooped and have a room temp iq level who literally thinks the moon is a spaceship
    I was referring to your crack use.

  3. #93
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 1987_Lakers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    26,457

    Default Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le

    Quote Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents View Post
    Tbf though you were genuinely arguing for a while Chris Bosh was better than still prime/FMVP Kobe, that's worse than claiming KG is top 10 all time.


    Low IQ

  4. #94
    NBA Superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    14,663

    Default Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le

    Quote Originally Posted by 1987_Lakers View Post

    Ben Taylor aka "thinking basketball" who is by far the best NBA analyst out there.


    Bro please stop with the debunked Ben Taylor - he was debunked when he said that Jordan's 1st three-peat casts were 75th percentile (better than 75% of casts) - this is still worse than 1 in 4 casts (7 of 28 teams), which is all 2nd Round opponents, aka 1st Round caliber... TLDR: Ben Taylor said that Jordan's 1st three-peat casts were 1st Round caliber (timestamp to 75th percentile remark here)

    Btw, Taylor's claim is that Jordan's impact isn't that high, except Taylor's numbers use different casts and guys that MJ never played with - Kukoc was the leader in Box Plus minus (BPM) for the 94' Playoffs, so he impacted differentials the most, but Jordan never played with him, which makes Taylor's numbers completely bogus - Kukoc wasn't some tiny role player that barely impacted the game - he was the team leader in BPM and closer, while every other position had been upgraded with guys that MJ never played with (Longley, Kerr, Harper, etc).. So Taylor is a buffoon and amateur with bogus "analysis".. aka sophistry to fool the nascent.. Again, Taylor says that MJ's 1st three-peat casts were 1st Round caliber, while the 88-90' and 2nd three-peat casts are actually among the worst in the league - this is what his own (bogus) numbers show, even with the Kukoc/new cast issue.

  5. #95
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer warriorfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    34,891

    Default Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le

    Quote Originally Posted by 3ba11 View Post
    Bro please stop with the debunked Ben Taylor - he was debunked when he said that Jordan's 1st three-peat casts were 75th percentile (better than 75% of casts) - this is still worse than 1 in 4 casts (7 of 28 teams), which is all 2nd Round opponents, aka 1st Round caliber... TLDR: Ben Taylor said that Jordan's 1st three-peat casts were 1st Round caliber (timestamp to 75th percentile remark here)

    Btw, Taylor's claim is that Jordan's impact isn't that high, except Taylor's numbers use different casts and guys that MJ never played with - Kukoc was the leader in Box Plus minus (BPM) for the 94' Playoffs, so he impacted differentials the most, but Jordan never played with him, which makes Taylor's numbers completely bogus - Kukoc wasn't some tiny role player that barely impacted the game - he was the team leader in BPM and closer, while every other position had been upgraded with guys that MJ never played with (Longley, Kerr, Harper, etc).. So Taylor is a buffoon and amateur with bogus "analysis".. aka sophistry to fool the nascent.. Again, Taylor says that MJ's 1st three-peat casts were 1st Round caliber, while the 88-90' and 2nd three-peat casts are actually among the worst in the league - this is what his own (bogus) numbers show, even with the Kukoc/new cast issue.
    I used to ether his ass on realgm well over 10 years ago

    He is a clown

  6. #96
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 1987_Lakers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    26,457

    Default Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le

    Quote Originally Posted by 3ba11 View Post
    Bro please stop with the debunked Ben Taylor - he was debunked when he said that Jordan's 1st three-peat casts were 75th percentile (better than 75% of casts) - this is still worse than 1 in 4 casts (7 of 28 teams), which is all 2nd Round opponents, aka 1st Round caliber... TLDR: Ben Taylor said that Jordan's 1st three-peat casts were 1st Round caliber (timestamp to 75th percentile remark here)

    Btw, Taylor's claim is that Jordan's impact isn't that high, except Taylor's numbers use different casts and guys that MJ never played with - Kukoc was the leader in Box Plus minus (BPM) for the 94' Playoffs, so he impacted differentials the most, but Jordan never played with him, which makes Taylor's numbers completely bogus - Kukoc wasn't some tiny role player that barely impacted the game - he was the team leader in BPM and closer, while every other position had been upgraded with guys that MJ never played with (Longley, Kerr, Harper, etc).. So Taylor is a buffoon and amateur with bogus "analysis".. aka sophistry to fool the nascent.. Again, Taylor says that MJ's 1st three-peat casts were 1st Round caliber, while the 88-90' and 2nd three-peat casts are actually among the worst in the league - this is what his own (bogus) numbers show, even with the Kukoc/new cast issue.
    The funny thing is, Ben Taylor still had MJ #1 in his all-time peaks project, but that still isn't good enough for you weirdos.

  7. #97
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 1987_Lakers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    26,457

    Default Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le

    Quote Originally Posted by warriorfan View Post
    I used to ether his ass on realgm well over 10 years ago

    He is a clown
    Only person you ethered is yourself in that "Curry wins 2015 FMVP thread".

  8. #98
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer warriorfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    34,891

    Default Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le

    Quote Originally Posted by 1987_Lakers View Post
    Only person you ethered is yourself in that "Curry wins 2015 FMVP thread".
    Yah man, Iguodala was more irreplaceable than Steph Curry



    You will always be a low iq fat kid at heart

  9. #99
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 1987_Lakers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    26,457

    Default Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le


  10. #100
    NBA Superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    14,663

    Default Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le

    Quote Originally Posted by 1987_Lakers View Post
    The funny thing is, Ben Taylor still had MJ #1 in his all-time peaks project, but that still isn't good enough for you weirdos.
    Taylor's a weirdo - he puts out a video that is meant to boost Jordan's cast, yet it actually takes a dump on them and uses bogus numbers/different casts (guys that MJ never played with)

  11. #101
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 1987_Lakers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    26,457

    Default Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le

    Quote Originally Posted by 3ba11 View Post
    Taylor's a weirdo
    You have literally made hundreds of threads about the same topics for a decade now.

    Where is the self awareness?

  12. #102
    NBA Superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    14,663

    Default Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le

    Quote Originally Posted by 1987_Lakers View Post
    You have literally made hundreds of threads about the same topics for a decade now.

    Where is the self awareness?

    That's not weird

    Otoh, it's weird to put out a video that is meant to boost Jordan's cast, yet it actually takes a dump on them and uses bogus numbers/different casts (guys that MJ never played with)

  13. #103
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 1987_Lakers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    26,457

    Default Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le

    Quote Originally Posted by 3ba11 View Post
    That's not weird

  14. #104
    Trumptard triggerer RRR3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    48,555

    Default Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le

    Quote Originally Posted by 3ba11 View Post
    That's not weird

  15. #105
    truth serum sdot_thadon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    5,850

    Default Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le

    Quote Originally Posted by 3ba11 View Post
    Taylor's a weirdo - he puts out a video that is meant to boost Jordan's cast, yet it actually takes a dump on them and uses bogus numbers/different casts (guys that MJ never played with)
    Bwhahahah Bro, you been running around on the net more than a decade solid spewing hundreds of thousands of posts like a deranged chap gpt that answers questions nobody asks about only one subject.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •