-
Embiid > Jokic
Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le
 Originally Posted by warriorfan
Dude is some nerd who never played basketball and says KG is top 10 of all time
Invalidates anything he says. Not even gonna listen to any of that nonsense. Also funny you have such a low ball iq and normal iq you can’t even articulate your own ideas in your own words.
Yikes.
Tbf though you were genuinely arguing for a while Chris Bosh was better than still prime/FMVP Kobe, that's worse than claiming KG is top 10 all time.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le
 Originally Posted by warriorfan
Yeah, you were an obese kid who never hooped and have a room temp iq level who literally thinks the moon is a spaceship
I was referring to your crack use.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le
 Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
Tbf though you were genuinely arguing for a while Chris Bosh was better than still prime/FMVP Kobe, that's worse than claiming KG is top 10 all time.

Low IQ
-
Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le
 Originally Posted by 1987_Lakers
Ben Taylor aka "thinking basketball" who is by far the best NBA analyst out there.
Bro please stop with the debunked Ben Taylor - he was debunked when he said that Jordan's 1st three-peat casts were 75th percentile (better than 75% of casts) - this is still worse than 1 in 4 casts (7 of 28 teams), which is all 2nd Round opponents, aka 1st Round caliber... TLDR: Ben Taylor said that Jordan's 1st three-peat casts were 1st Round caliber (timestamp to 75th percentile remark here)
Btw, Taylor's claim is that Jordan's impact isn't that high, except Taylor's numbers use different casts and guys that MJ never played with - Kukoc was the leader in Box Plus minus (BPM) for the 94' Playoffs, so he impacted differentials the most, but Jordan never played with him, which makes Taylor's numbers completely bogus - Kukoc wasn't some tiny role player that barely impacted the game - he was the team leader in BPM and closer, while every other position had been upgraded with guys that MJ never played with (Longley, Kerr, Harper, etc).. So Taylor is a buffoon and amateur with bogus "analysis".. aka sophistry to fool the nascent.. Again, Taylor says that MJ's 1st three-peat casts were 1st Round caliber, while the 88-90' and 2nd three-peat casts are actually among the worst in the league - this is what his own (bogus) numbers show, even with the Kukoc/new cast issue.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le
 Originally Posted by 3ba11
Bro please stop with the debunked Ben Taylor - he was debunked when he said that Jordan's 1st three-peat casts were 75th percentile (better than 75% of casts) - this is still worse than 1 in 4 casts (7 of 28 teams), which is all 2nd Round opponents, aka 1st Round caliber... TLDR: Ben Taylor said that Jordan's 1st three-peat casts were 1st Round caliber (timestamp to 75th percentile remark here)
Btw, Taylor's claim is that Jordan's impact isn't that high, except Taylor's numbers use different casts and guys that MJ never played with - Kukoc was the leader in Box Plus minus (BPM) for the 94' Playoffs, so he impacted differentials the most, but Jordan never played with him, which makes Taylor's numbers completely bogus - Kukoc wasn't some tiny role player that barely impacted the game - he was the team leader in BPM and closer, while every other position had been upgraded with guys that MJ never played with (Longley, Kerr, Harper, etc).. So Taylor is a buffoon and amateur with bogus "analysis".. aka sophistry to fool the nascent.. Again, Taylor says that MJ's 1st three-peat casts were 1st Round caliber, while the 88-90' and 2nd three-peat casts are actually among the worst in the league - this is what his own (bogus) numbers show, even with the Kukoc/new cast issue.
I used to ether his ass on realgm well over 10 years ago
He is a clown
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le
 Originally Posted by 3ba11
Bro please stop with the debunked Ben Taylor - he was debunked when he said that Jordan's 1st three-peat casts were 75th percentile (better than 75% of casts) - this is still worse than 1 in 4 casts (7 of 28 teams), which is all 2nd Round opponents, aka 1st Round caliber... TLDR: Ben Taylor said that Jordan's 1st three-peat casts were 1st Round caliber (timestamp to 75th percentile remark here)
Btw, Taylor's claim is that Jordan's impact isn't that high, except Taylor's numbers use different casts and guys that MJ never played with - Kukoc was the leader in Box Plus minus (BPM) for the 94' Playoffs, so he impacted differentials the most, but Jordan never played with him, which makes Taylor's numbers completely bogus - Kukoc wasn't some tiny role player that barely impacted the game - he was the team leader in BPM and closer, while every other position had been upgraded with guys that MJ never played with (Longley, Kerr, Harper, etc).. So Taylor is a buffoon and amateur with bogus "analysis".. aka sophistry to fool the nascent.. Again, Taylor says that MJ's 1st three-peat casts were 1st Round caliber, while the 88-90' and 2nd three-peat casts are actually among the worst in the league - this is what his own (bogus) numbers show, even with the Kukoc/new cast issue.
The funny thing is, Ben Taylor still had MJ #1 in his all-time peaks project, but that still isn't good enough for you weirdos.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le
 Originally Posted by warriorfan
I used to ether his ass on realgm well over 10 years ago
He is a clown
Only person you ethered is yourself in that "Curry wins 2015 FMVP thread".
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le
-
07-16-2025, 11:12 PM
#100
Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le
 Originally Posted by 1987_Lakers
The funny thing is, Ben Taylor still had MJ #1 in his all-time peaks project, but that still isn't good enough for you weirdos.
Taylor's a weirdo - he puts out a video that is meant to boost Jordan's cast, yet it actually takes a dump on them and uses bogus numbers/different casts (guys that MJ never played with)
-
07-16-2025, 11:20 PM
#101
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le
 Originally Posted by 3ba11
Taylor's a weirdo
You have literally made hundreds of threads about the same topics for a decade now.
Where is the self awareness?
-
07-16-2025, 11:27 PM
#102
Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le
 Originally Posted by 1987_Lakers
You have literally made hundreds of threads about the same topics for a decade now.
Where is the self awareness?
That's not weird
Otoh, it's weird to put out a video that is meant to boost Jordan's cast, yet it actually takes a dump on them and uses bogus numbers/different casts (guys that MJ never played with)
-
07-16-2025, 11:28 PM
#103
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le
 Originally Posted by 3ba11
That's not weird
-
07-16-2025, 11:28 PM
#104
Trumptard triggerer
Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le
-
07-16-2025, 11:51 PM
#105
truth serum
Re: +2800 roster and sidekick < Hornacek, so 73 wins means CURRY is goat-like, not le
 Originally Posted by 3ba11
Taylor's a weirdo - he puts out a video that is meant to boost Jordan's cast, yet it actually takes a dump on them and uses bogus numbers/different casts (guys that MJ never played with)
Bwhahahah Bro, you been running around on the net more than a decade solid spewing hundreds of thousands of posts like a deranged chap gpt that answers questions nobody asks about only one subject.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|