Kerr says bulls couldnt win more than 3 in a row

[Dr. Ice]

In fact, he says the only reason they have 2 three peats is because jordan took that break in between. If jordan had not went to baseball and decided to stay in basketball, they would have lost.

So let's stop disregarding hakeem's championships gentlemen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqyvAg7z5fA

[Go Getter]

Pretty sure the majority of non-Jordan dick slobber already knew that.

I'm not sure but neither are you or Kerr. Stop being a trolling POS.

[(e)]

I'd never bet against MJ.

[andgar923]

Who would've wanted to bet against MJ tho?

[The_Yearning]

How would Kerr know? How would anyone know for certain? Like Barkley said... if dude couldn't shoot he'd have no reason for anything.

[andgar923]

How would Kerr know? How would anyone know for certain? Like Barkley said... if dude couldn't shoot he'd have no reason for anything.

They used to say MJ couldn't 3Peat, he did that. He wanted to beat Magic and Bird, his next challenge/goal would've been Russell. Not that he could've beat or matched Russell's rings, but he would've been driven enough to NOT let him lose focus.

Who knows tho.

Kerr wasn't with them in the first 3peat. And just because he may have been drained and couldn't go any further mentally, it doesn't mean MJ wouldn't push and will himself and others to do so.

[Dragonyeuw]

I think the 94 team had a great chance to win the title. Jordan was 31 at the time, Pippen( let's not forget how good he was at that point) and Grant were 28 and in their prime, BJ had developed into a dependable backcourt mate for MJ, and then you bring in Kukoc off the bench? Don't see why they couldn't have won in 94.

Now the 95 title, that's when I think fatigue, disinterest, injuries,etc could have set in and then top it off with Grant leaving for Orlando, leaving them paper thin up front. I'd say they lose in 95 even if Jordan hadn't retired.

[kshutts1]

Based on how well the Bulls did without Jordan there, I'd say he would likely have been enough to push them over the top.

But obviously we can't assume that the Bulls would win those two years, nor can we assume that they would still win those last 3... All things/factors would change.

[NumberSix]

Who would've wanted to bet against MJ tho?

Probably Shaq and Penny in 95.

[andgar923]

Probably Shaq and Penny in 95.

Really, that's your best answer?

What happened to them the following year MJ was in full force?

[97 bulls]

I think the 94 team had a great chance to win the title. Jordan was 31 at the time, Pippen( let's not forget how good he was at that point) and Grant were 28 and in their prime, BJ had developed into a dependable backcourt mate for MJ, and then you bring in Kukoc off the bench? Don't see why they couldn't have won in 94.

Now the 95 title, that's when I think fatigue, disinterest, injuries,etc could have set in and then top it off with Grant leaving for Orlando, leaving them paper thin up front. I'd say they lose in 95 even if Jordan hadn't retired.

This.

The 94 Bulls were essentially the 96 Bulls with Rodman taking Grants place and a Kukoc with two years NBA experience under his belt.

[All Net]

MJ managed to recharge his batteries which played a big factor the 2nd time round. Winning year after year in what is such a long season takes a super human effort which is why if Miami don

[NumberSix]

Really, that's your best answer?

What happened to them the following year MJ was in full force?

What exactly is "full force" and how was '95 not included.

[Mr. Incredible]

Coming from the biggest Bulls homer of all-time, that says something.

[sportjames23]

I'd never bet against MJ.

This here. Anyone with common sense would say the same.

Lebron ass-eaters don't have common sense, doe.