who will you be voting for in november and why?

[diamenz]

who will you be voting for in november and why?

[SATAN]

Mind your own business.

[jstern]

I made the mistake of making the Do you support Joe Biden? thread public, because it meant that those who voted yes would have to show their faces, even with severe TDS. And even with TDS it's just embarrassing to admit that you support Joe Biden, not just because of what a disaster he has been (The wide open border, inflation, murders, the hundreds of thousands dead Ukrainians and Russians). But the way he touches little kids. So the results are not going to be very accurate.

[Bill Gates]

Unsurprisingly the same posters who constantly talk about IQ levels are the same posters who think a poll in this place means something.

[jstern]

VictorMosquito also voted Trump and Biden.

[bladefd]

I will vote for who you tell me to diamenz. Who should I vote for and why?

[diamenz]

I will vote for who you tell me to diamenz. Who should I vote for and why?

you're asking who i would i recommend voting for? personally i'm not a fan of any of the candidates including rfk. if i were to go to the voting booth in november, it would certainly not be for joe biden, i can tell you that much. i don't support open borders, nor funding two wars we have no business being a part while we're 33 trillion $ in debt nor do i support virtue signaling for apparent 'minority groups' that democrats really don't give two shits about.

would i vote trump or rfk? probably not. if trump were to take a stance against our foreign policy establishment then yes - absolutely.

[Patrick Chewing]

There is no way Trump loses this election.

[Lakers Legend#32]

There is no way Trump loses this election.

Evidence?

You also said there was going to be a Red Wave in 2022 that never materialized.

[2qr3]

I will vote for who you tell me to diamenz. Who should I vote for and why?

Diamenz may harbor his own intricate web of biases, motivations, or agendas, when offering his recommendation. His prioritization of specific issues or candidates might not necessarily resonate with your own beliefs or interests. Placing unwavering trust in his guidance, without scrutiny could potentially result in backing a candidate who fails to authentically reflect your values. Therefore, I must strongly advise against unquestioningly adhering to anyone's suggestion on whom to support in the election, including mine.

You, as an individual, possess a kaleidoscope of unique perspectives, and blindly adhering to someone else's counsel means disregarding your own unique viewpoint. This approach deprives you of the opportunity to thoroughly evaluate the available choices.

[diamenz]

Diamenz may harbor his own intricate web of biases, motivations, or agendas, when offering his recommendation. His prioritization of specific issues or candidates might not necessarily resonate with your own beliefs or interests. Placing unwavering trust in his guidance, without scrutiny could potentially result in backing a candidate who fails to authentically reflect your values. Therefore, I must strongly advise against unquestioningly adhering to anyone's suggestion on whom to support in the election, including mine.

You, as an individual, possess a kaleidoscope of unique perspectives, and blindly adhering to someone else's counsel means disregarding your own unique viewpoint. This approach deprives you of the opportunity to thoroughly evaluate the available choices.

thank you. blade made me feel extremely uncomfortable when he asked that question. i have no idea why he'd be so compelled to look for my guidance on a topic that should be decided entirely on his own accord. at first i thought he was just being facetious, but given how much he's demonstrated his inability to think for himself and not be programmed by msnbc, i immediately dismissed that possibility.

[bladefd]

Diamenz may harbor his own intricate web of biases, motivations, or agendas, when offering his recommendation. His prioritization of specific issues or candidates might not necessarily resonate with your own beliefs or interests. Placing unwavering trust in his guidance, without scrutiny could potentially result in backing a candidate who fails to authentically reflect your values. Therefore, I must strongly advise against unquestioningly adhering to anyone's suggestion on whom to support in the election, including mine.

You, as an individual, possess a kaleidoscope of unique perspectives, and blindly adhering to someone else's counsel means disregarding your own unique viewpoint. This approach deprives you of the opportunity to thoroughly evaluate the available choices.

I was hoping for a compelling argument from him as to why Trump is the best candidate for the job. I didn't get one. All I got was jibberish propaganda you would hear on FauxNews.

"open borders"
"funding 2 wars"
"33 trillion in debt"
"virtue signaling"

Nonsense phrase words of Fauxnews crowd that they enjoy throwing around. I expected as much. It would be a waste of time to refute him on the propaganda phrases so I left it alone for my own sanity.

[jstern]

thank you. blade made me feel extremely uncomfortable when he asked that question. i have no idea why he'd be so compelled to look for my guidance on a topic that should be decided entirely on his own accord. at first i thought he was just being facetious, but given how much he's demonstrated his inability to think for himself and not be programmed by msnbc, i immediately dismissed that possibility.

Blade needs to learn to stop blindly following what outside entities tell him. He needs to learn to think for himself. But since he's not going to, and/or might not be capable of doing so due to potential mental illness, I would suggest for him to blindly follow diamenz, instead of CNN, MSNBC, Rachel Madow, Joe Biden, etc.

[diamenz]

I was hoping for a compelling argument from him as to why Trump is the best candidate for the job. I didn't get one. All I got was jibberish propaganda you would hear on FauxNews.

"open borders"
"funding 2 wars"
"33 trillion in debt"
"virtue signaling"

Nonsense phrase words of Fauxnews crowd that they enjoy throwing around. I expected as much. It would be a waste of time to refute him on the propaganda phrases so I left it alone for my own sanity.

so in other words, if i'm understanding you correctly, you made an assumption about me being a trump guy but ended up being wrong about it?

...fox news talking points? okay. let's say that's true just for argument's sake.
which one of those issues is propaganda? furthermore, which one of those, if any, are not pressing issues (aside from of course Democrat's virtue signaling)?

you're lost bro. you need to think before you speak.

remember, i'm the same guy that convinced you otherwise over the real reasons for the ukraine war. don't make me bring up that post. so lend me at least some kind of credibility.

[diamenz]

would suggest for him to blindly follow diamenz, instead of CNN, MSNBC, Rachel Madow, Joe Biden, etc.

i wouldn't recommend it, but in all modesty, yeah - he'd probably be better off doing so considering how far he's fallen.