Wizards jordon was worse than nearly any all-time great who played until his late 30s

[1987_Lakers]

The Spurs never won back-to-back let alone Three-Peat cheapening Lebrons strength of opponents.

I guess the Showtime Lakers weren't a great team since they didn't 3 peat.

Or Bird's Celtics since they never won back to back

Low Iq confirmed.

[Axe]

The Spurs never won back-to-back let alone Three-Peat cheapening Lebrons strength of opponents.

Retarded logic lmao. For you, that seems worse than jordan's ringless opponents in the finals.

[theman93]

You asked if either the celtics, the pistons or the knicks in the 80s and 90s were dynasties bt. And i just showed you that one. ;)

You didn't show anything besides that you're wrong about me having alts lol

[Axe]

You didn't show anything besides that you're wrong about me having alts lol

Huh, i never said they were your 'alts' coach. Wtf.

What i'm pointing out there was how they apply the term 'dynasty' to successful teams. They say if they never 'three-peated', then they're never one to begin with.

[theman93]

You already admitted LeBron was better.

When that's my starting position, it's not an admission. Do you understand basic debate?

My position has been clear -
Individually: 37 y/o Lebron > 38 y/o MJ
Team Elevation: 38 y/o MJ > 37 y/o Lebron

You've done nothing to dispute this fact.

[theman93]

Huh, i never said they were your 'alts' coach. Wtf.

What i'm pointing out there was how they apply the term 'dynasty' to successful teams. They say if they never 'three-peated', then they're never one to begin with.

Why do I care how 2 other posters are applying the term dynasty? It's irrelevant. The point being is that Jordan facing the 80's Celtics and 80/90's Pistons is a significantly harder challenge than facing the 90's Knicks.

[Xiao Yao You]

Probably to win a scoring title despite missing 64 games that season.

https://www.sportscasting.com/frustr...position-1986/

“That’s when I felt more frustrated than anything. More than anything, I felt they were positioning themselves for the draft, and I didn’t feel good being part of that. I felt I was an all-out player who didn’t half-ass anything, and they wanted to move up (in the draft). I was a player, I wanted to play.”

keep reaching!

[Axe]

Why do I care how 2 other posters are applying the term dynasty? It's irrelevant. The point being is that Jordan facing the 80's Celtics and 80/90's Pistons is a significantly harder challenge than facing the 90's Knicks.

Probably. But that doesn't explain why jordan never had any winning seasons until pippen started playing for the bulls.

[RogueBorg]

I guess the Showtime Lakers weren't a great team since they didn't 3 peat.

Or Bird's Celtics since they never won back to back

Low Iq confirmed.

The Three-Peat requirement for a dynasty is not my definition, Axe is the one throwing it out there. My definition is at least back-to-back titles.

Yes, Boston never won back-to-back but neither did San Antonio. The Lakers and Pistons are dynasties.

[RogueBorg]

Retarded logic lmao. For you, that seems worse than jordan's ringless opponents in the finals.

Are the Spurs a dynasty?

The Bulls opponents are ringless because they kept them ringless. Unlike Lebron where teams won alot against him.

[Axe]

The Three-Peat requirement for a dynasty is not my definition, Axe is the one throwing it out there. My definition is at least back-to-back titles.

Yes, Boston never won back-to-back but neither did San Antonio. The Lakers and Pistons are dynasties.

I don't believe that shit either. The purpose was to show that one of your fellow lebron haters think a 'three-peat' is necessary for teams to become a dynasty. You really are a dumbass.

[Axe]

Are the Spurs a dynasty?

The Bulls opponents are ringless because they kept them ringless. Unlike Lebron where teams won alot against him.

Yet they have a higher srs than any of the teams jordan beat in the finals lmao.

[RogueBorg]

The purpose was to show that one of your fellow lebron haters think a 'three-peat' is necessary for teams to become a dynasty. You really are a dumbass.

Try to follow along.

TheMan93 was making the argument that the Celtics and Pistons were dynasties, he said to you "Were the mid 90's Knicks a dynasty that Pippen ran in to? Or was Bird's Celtics and the Bad Boy Pistons a dynasty that MJ ran in to?"

Your response to him in post #219 was "But those aren't dynasties coach. Since someone said 'dynasties' have to 'three-peat' first."


You said they aren't dynasties "But those aren't dynasties coach.

Go back and read post #219.

[Axe]

And then i said someone else mentioned it. Lol all of a sudden you're so fixated into it.

Try going btt, you buffoon.

[theman93]

Probably. But that doesn't explain why jordan never had any winning seasons until pippen started playing for the bulls.

No, not probably. 100% definitely.

If you want to believe a bench player putting up 8/4 on bad efficiency was the reason the Bulls made the playoffs, that's fine you can believe whatever you want. It just shows you're low IQ. No objective person believes that though.