| 
  
		
		
	 
	
	
		
			
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Happy birthday Lebron James
					
						
							
 happy birthday to the greatest player of all time.
						 
	
	
		
			
			
				National High School Star
			
			
			
			
			 
			
				
 
					    
				 
			
				
				
				
					 Re: Happy birthday Lebron James 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: Happy birthday Lebron James
					
						
							40 year old Jordan was STILL better. Deal with it.
						 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: Happy birthday Lebron James 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: Happy birthday Lebron James
					
						
							"To be honest, if I really wanted to, I could probably play this game at a high level probably for about another -- it's weird that I might say this -- but probably about another 5-7 years, if I wanted to," James said. "But I'm not going to do that."
 https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/...ther-5-7-years
 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: Happy birthday Lebron James
					
						
							The "best basketball" can be defined as dominant champions that averaged 1 loss per round or less (4 losses max), or dynasties that mostly won for a material stretch of 5+ years (i.e. 3 in 5 years).
 Accordingly, since possession-tracking began in 1997, 1st options with assisted rates that ranged between 40-60% in their primes (jumpshooters or bigs) were 1st option for 12 of 12 dynasties or dominant champions (the best basketball).. Otoh, 1st options with assisted rates between 20-40% in their prime (ball-dominators) were never 1st option for the best basketball (0 for 12).
 
 Since the best jumpshooters and bigs produce the best basketball, they're superior to the best ball-dominators, so the first ball-dominators appear in the all-time rankings at 11th, 12th, and 13th (Magic, Lebron, Oscar).. The issue is that low-assisted 1st options have a high volume of unassisted buckets that hinders ball movement, while highly-assisted 1st options produce higher-assist teams and foster the great ball movement that every dynasty has.
 
 The full rankings are MJ, Kareem, Russell, Wilt, Kobe, Bird, Duncan, Shaq, Curry, Jokic, Magic, Lebron, Oscar - the 2nd thru 10th spots are more interchangeable and subjective, but it's set in stone that MJ is #1 and ball-dominators are no higher than 11th, based on the previous logic that ball-dominators are never the 1st option for the best basketball (dynasties or dominant champions).
 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: Happy birthday Lebron James
					
						
							Happy 40th to LeGOAT   
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: Happy birthday Lebron James
					
						
							
	Thanks for stopping by.
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by 3ba11   The "best basketball" can be defined as dominant champions that averaged 1 loss per round or less (4 losses max), or dynasties that mostly won for a material stretch of 5+ years (i.e. 3 in 5 years).
 Accordingly, since possession-tracking began in 1997, 1st options with assisted rates that ranged between 40-60% in their primes (jumpshooters or bigs) were 1st option for 12 of 12 dynasties or dominant champions (the best basketball).. Otoh, 1st options with assisted rates between 20-40% in their prime (ball-dominators) were never 1st option for the best basketball (0 for 12).
 
 Since the best jumpshooters and bigs produce the best basketball, they're superior to the best ball-dominators, so the first ball-dominators appear in the all-time rankings at 11th, 12th, and 13th (Magic, Lebron, Oscar).. The issue is that low-assisted 1st options have a high volume of unassisted buckets that hinders ball movement, while highly-assisted 1st options produce higher-assist teams and foster the great ball movement that every dynasty has.
 
 The full rankings are MJ, Kareem, Russell, Wilt, Kobe, Bird, Duncan, Shaq, Curry, Jokic, Magic, Lebron, Oscar - the 2nd thru 10th spots are more interchangeable and subjective, but it's set in stone that MJ is #1 and ball-dominators are no higher than 11th, based on the previous logic that ball-dominators are never the 1st option for the best basketball (dynasties or dominant champions).
 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: Happy birthday Lebron James
					
						
							
	Extra probably.
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by Hey Yo   "To be honest, if I really wanted to, I could probably play this game at a high level probably for about another -- it's weird that I might say this -- but probably about another 5-7 years, if I wanted to," James said. "But I'm not going to do that."https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/...ther-5-7-years 
 He should play more years just to prove his shit talking. Yeah, he is great at 40, but I wanna see him go at least 2-3 more. One for every probably in that statement.
 
 -Smak
 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: Happy birthday Lebron James
					
						
							
	Almost as dumb as his "Not five, not six, not seven..."
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by Hey Yo   "To be honest, if I really wanted to, I could probably play this game at a high level probably for about another -- it's weird that I might say this -- but probably about another 5-7 years, if I wanted to," James said. "But I'm not going to do that."https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/...ther-5-7-years  
 He's as delusional as as his fans on here.
 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: Happy birthday Lebron James
					
						
							Happy Birthday to our King.
						 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: Happy birthday Lebron James
					
						
							
	Bransexuals will buy into whatever the narcissistic pos has to say. Lol
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by Full Court   Almost as dumb as his "Not five, not six, not seven..."    
He's as delusional as as his fans on here. 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
				
					 Re: Happy birthday Lebron James
					
						
							
	I have Magic way higher than you on my list, and Kobe much lower.
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by 3ba11   The "best basketball" can be defined as dominant champions that averaged 1 loss per round or less (4 losses max), or dynasties that mostly won for a material stretch of 5+ years (i.e. 3 in 5 years).
 Accordingly, since possession-tracking began in 1997, 1st options with assisted rates that ranged between 40-60% in their primes (jumpshooters or bigs) were 1st option for 12 of 12 dynasties or dominant champions (the best basketball).. Otoh, 1st options with assisted rates between 20-40% in their prime (ball-dominators) were never 1st option for the best basketball (0 for 12).
 
 Since the best jumpshooters and bigs produce the best basketball, they're superior to the best ball-dominators, so the first ball-dominators appear in the all-time rankings at 11th, 12th, and 13th (Magic, Lebron, Oscar).. The issue is that low-assisted 1st options have a high volume of unassisted buckets that hinders ball movement, while highly-assisted 1st options produce higher-assist teams and foster the great ball movement that every dynasty has.
 
 The full rankings are MJ, Kareem, Russell, Wilt, Kobe, Bird, Duncan, Shaq, Curry, Jokic, Magic, Lebron, Oscar - the 2nd thru 10th spots are more interchangeable and subjective, but it's set in stone that MJ is #1 and ball-dominators are no higher than 11th, based on the previous logic that ball-dominators are never the 1st option for the best basketball (dynasties or dominant champions).
 MJ, KAJ, Wilt, Magic, Bird, Shaq, Duncan, Hakeem, Russell, Oscar, Kobe, Jokic, Curry round out my top 13.
 
 
	
	
 
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
				 Posting Permissions
				
	
		You may not post new threadsYou may not post repliesYou may not post attachmentsYou may not edit your posts  Forum Rules 
  
  
 
 
 |