InsideHoops NBA [HOME]
|
Oct 21, 2003 |
Antoine Walker Mavs-Celtics trade analysis
By David Arrojo
Celtics fans should be green with envy. Walker was a steal for the Mavericks, who are the undisputed winners of the 5-player Boston-Dallas swap.
It was a move that was months in the making.
After having been outplayed and overmatched by both Jermaine O'Neal and
Kenyon Martin in the playoffs, Antoine Walker seemed bound for another NBA
team. For those who still had their doubts, Walker's departure was all but
assured when the Celtics hired Danny Ainge, an outspoken critic of the
forward's poor shot selection and style of play, to be their new President
of Basketball Operations. Within days of Ainge's hiring, rumors swirled
throughout the league that Walker's days with "the Green" were numbered.
So when it was announced Monday that the Celtics had sent him packing, the
move wasn't all that surprising.
Yet the result surely was.
Ainge packaged Walker and sharpshooter Tony Delk for Dallas' Raef
LaFrentz, Jiri Welsch, Chris Mills and a lottery pick. All of the sudden,
the Mavs are stocked with more guns than a pawn shop, and the Celtics'
roster is just plain bare.
Throughout the offseason, Ainge made no secret of his desire to acquire a
legitimate center and a solid point guard to shore up the Celtics'
rotation. Yet even though Ainge's latest transaction landed him one of the
pieces he so greatly coveted, it seems to have come at a significant
expense.
Although Walker's shooting percentage have been low and numbers have been
faltering (his 7.2 rebounds per game were a career low, and his 4.8 assist
average was his lowest since the lockout-shortened season), he nonetheless
ranked as the team's second leading scorer and rebounder in the previous
season. Critics are also quick to forget that the eighth-year forward did
so after battling knee problems all year. And despite any of these flaws,
Walker averaged more than 20 points a night, often sparking key runs down
the stretch of close games.
But with Walker gone, who will replace his offensive production? Pierce
already set a career high last season in nightly shot attempts, and looked
tired down the stretch as well. LaFrentz's output as a Maverick was
erratic at best, and though the center shone while in Denver several
seasons ago, his work ethic has been questioned. Many consider Welsch to
have potential, but the second-year veteran averaged a measly 1.8 points
per game in his rookie year on 25% shooting, and his playing time behind
Pierce will likely be limited. Walter McCarty and Jumaine Jones, while
respected role players, contribute only single-digit scoring averages.
Barring the emergence of a powerful scoring threat, the Celtics will be
pressed to find a consistent second option on offense to support Pierce.
Walker's loss will also hurt the Celtics' playmaking abilities. Since
trading Kenny Anderson to Seattle in 2002, Boston has resorted to playing
point guard-by-committee. Rookie J.R. Bremer and Delk were plugged into
the lineup last year, but the responsibility of initiating the offense
rested squarely on Walker's shoulders - and he led the team in assists.
Now, with neither Walker, Delk, nor Bremer remaining on the roster,
O'Brien is left with an untested newcomer (Marcus Banks) and a serviceable
second-string backup (Mike James) to coordinate his offense. Given that
the Celtics' lack of strength at the point guard position already created
difficulties for last year's squad, this deficiency will be even more
pronounced now that Walker and his superior passing abilities have left
town.
Perhaps most importantly, however, the Celtics have lost a locker room
presence and a team leader in Walker. As Pierce himself noted following
the 2002 playoffs, people "can see what [Antoine] does on the court, but
they would have to be around him on a daily basis to appreciate his
charisma, his consistent leadership, his mental toughness. When Antoine
speaks, we hear him." The trade of Walker disrupts a favorable chemistry
that carried the Celtics to the Eastern Conference finals in 2002, and
deprives the team of an emotional, professional, community-minded
player-hardly a commodity in today's league.
The Mavs, by contrast, have deprived themselves of nothing. They have
added a scorer who will more than fill the offensive void left by Van
Exel's departure. Don Nelson has demonstrated an uncanny ability to manage
multiple egos and play players out of position effectively, and should
continue to do so even with Walker in his lineup. And because Walker is
able to opt out of the final year of his contract at the end of the
2003-2004 season, the transaction could actually save the Mavericks
bundles in salary money. Even if the former Celtic does not mesh with the
team system, Dallas management has an excess of trade fodder with which to
include Walker as part of yet another blockbuster deal.
Another multiplayer trade tipped decisively in Dallas' favor.
Objectively, Ainge inherited a bad situation in Walker: since management
wasn't willing to meet Antoine's price for an extension next season, this
year probably would have been his last as a Celtic. For Ainge to seek
something in return was a wise move, but to trade an All-Star for a
bloated 6-year contract and some extra millions in salary cap relief (i.e.
Chris Mills' salary which, because of injury, will be covered largely by
insurance) suggests that Ainge and the Celtic organization grossly
undervalued Walker's contribution to their team. Monday's swap was not at
all commensurate, and for the second time in several months, Mark Cuban's
Mavericks have once again executed a sensational trade. And for this,
Celtics fans should be green with envy.
|